Re: Pellet's Cyanotype positive process
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: Pellet's Cyanotype positive process
- From: Stane Kocar <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 07:10:01 +0200
- Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
- List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- References: <44EBDD08.email@example.com><002901c6c68a$1446ab40$c20ed6d8@k1t0l0> <44EC444B.firstname.lastname@example.org><005f01c6c6aa$fb73d450$0400a8c0@xxx3973844ccd4><Pine.NEB.email@example.com>
- Reply-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Judy, thank you for the information.
I would like to try it just for fun, but if the results is not so good (or
worthwile), I will think about it.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Judy Seigel" <email@example.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: Pellet's Cyanotype positive process
I tried it years ago... not with a great effort but enough to find it
didn't work easily & took a lot of strong chemicals, far more than
"regular" cyano....and now it's so easy to make a digital negative
(providing you have nerves of steel), didn't seem worth more trouble.
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Stane Kocar wrote:
Did anyone try Pellet's Cyanotype positive process?
Thank you, any info will be great.
Regards from Slovenia
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.5/426 - Release Date: 23.8.2006