Re: Pellet's Cyanotype positive process
- To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
- Subject: Re: Pellet's Cyanotype positive process
- From: Stane Kocar <stane.kocar@siol.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 07:10:01 +0200
- Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
- List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
- References: <44EBDD08.1060201@danforthsource.com><002901c6c68a$1446ab40$c20ed6d8@k1t0l0> <44EC444B.2010504@bellsouth.net><005f01c6c6aa$fb73d450$0400a8c0@xxx3973844ccd4><Pine.NEB.4.63.0608241523280.5026@panix1.panix.com>
- Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Judy, thank you for the information.
I would like to try it just for fun, but if the results is not so good (or
worthwile), I will think about it.
Thanks again
Stane
----- Original Message -----
From: "Judy Seigel" <jseigel@panix.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Thursday, August 24, 2006 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: Pellet's Cyanotype positive process
I tried it years ago... not with a great effort but enough to find it
didn't work easily & took a lot of strong chemicals, far more than
"regular" cyano....and now it's so easy to make a digital negative
(providing you have nerves of steel), didn't seem worth more trouble.
Judy
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Stane Kocar wrote:
Did anyone try Pellet's Cyanotype positive process?
Thank you, any info will be great.
Regards from Slovenia
Stane Kocar
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.11.5/426 - Release Date: 23.8.2006