RE: Van Dyke and Kallitype

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: Van Dyke and Kallitype
From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 21:19:59 +0300
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <BV.WM.2.0.pv.1.0.16.0609211840300.40767@webm6.global.net.uk>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Thread-index: AcbdpUaS5J0Wj+n3TI+6P5SwcbYq4AABHYDQ

Well, Argyrotype is nice indeed (especially if you use sun for exposures - because it's a POP / self-masking process). But since I'm considerably more happier with my Kallitype trials, I think I'll prefer Kallitype for future iron-silver prints...

Best regards,

Loris.

From: davidhatton@totalise.co.uk [mailto:davidhatton@totalise.co.uk]
Sent: 21 Eylül 2006 Perþembe 20:41
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: Van Dyke and Kallitype

Hi Sandy et al,

How would you rate the newcomer to the family, Argyrotype?

David H

References:
- RE: Van Dyke and Kallitype
  - From: davidhatton@totalise.co.uk