Re: dig negs (Burkholder)
On Oct 4, 2006, at 8:08 PM, Ender100@aol.com wrote:
Hi Katherine,Mark, my comment referred directly to the recommmendation that people buy both systems, which I said was a fair recommendation and would give people a complete picture, but that not everyone can afford to do. I wasn't saying that your system by itself cost $100+. I was saying that both systems together would cost $100+. I would have thought that would have been clear.
I don't intend to, unless I saw very clear evidence that something else could give me superior results, but my own practice wasn't the point of that post. The point was to show people of limited means that contrary to what they're being told by groupies, it's possible to make decent gum prints without any system.
In a message dated 10/4/06 2:05:39 PM, email@example.com writes:I have nothing against this recommendation on principle; it's fair and if you've got both, you'll have more of a complete picture. On the other hand, it may come as a surprise to some, but there are actually people in the world to whom $100+ is a whole heck of a lot of money, maybe even some people on this list who aspire to gum printing.