Re: digital negative possibilities for gum

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: digital negative possibilities for gum
From: Camden Hardy <camden@hardyphotography.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 22:26:09 -0600 (MDT)
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <6EC66729-3BD0-4ECD-87EC-4B42658BDF33@pacifier.com>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <3ad.849ca9a.326971b6@aol.com><6EC66729-3BD0-4ECD-87EC-4B42658BDF33@pacifier.com>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.6

>> I am not sure what you are asking when you said "why?" below.

Some people prefer the rough, gritty look.  I know I do sometimes...


Camden Hardy

camden[at]hardyphotography[dot]net
http://www.hardyphotography.net

Follow-Ups:
- Re: digital negative possibilities for gum
  - From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>

References:
- Re: digital negative possibilities for gum
  - From: Ender100@aol.com
- Re: digital negative possibilities for gum
  - From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>