Re: HDR (somewhat off topic)
I'll second the suggestion of PhotoMatix. They also have a free trial on their website so you can at least test it out. Also, they have the ToneMapping plug-in, but I'd heartily suggest just getting the entire software package for the extra $30 or whatever it is as ToneMapping doesn't work for all images (and I'd probably say that it doesn't work for most...).
-Jeremy- On 10/24/06, Camden Hardy <camden@hardyphotography.net> wrote:
Thanks, Kerik (I apologize for sending this to you twice...didn't notice
that it was your address in the To: line).
I guess I should have clarified this in my original post, but I'm looking
for something to install in the digital photo lab here at MSU.
Our budget these days is pretty tight...$99 is getting toward the
expensive end, but it may be doable.
Are there any others out there worth looking into?
Camden Hardy
camden[at]hardyphotography[dot]net
http://www.hardyphotography.net
On Tue, October 24, 2006 10:21 am, kerik@kerik.com wrote:
> I don't know what you consider inexpensive, but I recently started using
> Photomatix by http://www.hdrsoft.com/. I've been pretty pleased with the
> results so far, but I'm still learning...
>
> Kerik
>
www.kerik.com
>
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: Camden Hardy camden@hardyphotography.net
> Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 09:56:24 -0600 (MDT)
> To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
> Subject: HDR (somewhat off topic)
>
>
> I was wondering if anyone out there can recommend some good HDR software,
> preferrably something free or inexpensive. Photoshop's HDR plugin is just
> terrible...
>
> Thanks,
> Camden Hardy
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> mail2web - Check your email from the web at
> http://mail2web.com/ .
>
>
>
Camden Hardy
camden[at]hardyphotography[dot]net
http://www.hardyphotography.net
|