Re: How many gum layers (Re: ferri sesquichlorati)
And this... :-) Kees I did gum printing about 10 yrs ago and this is roughly the way I did it then, except I used "normal" silver negs. Assumed since then that this is the way one does gum. Did first come across the pigment adjustment method recently & got a bit confused. Pigment description is from : Wall, E. J., Jordan, F. I. Carroll, J. S. ed. Photographic Facts and Formulas. PrenticeHall and Amphoto. 1975. pp 313-14. Both methods seems to give more or less straight curves, when you cut of the top/dmax, (Found the rest of that book very interesting, the "pepper dusting on process" has to be tried some day :-) And the best description I have seen so far of the fresson process.) I think I quietly back out of the rest of this debate :-) On 10/25/06 12:51 AM, "Kees Brandenburg" <ctb@zeelandnet.nl> wrote: > Hi Halvor, > > For me the first method works best. I try to make negatives that fit > carefully with the short scale of gum. The most important is to > transfer all information in the original image to this negative > (digital or analog the same). This does not mean information gets > lost, it's only distributed à la gum. When printed with the first > gumlayer and with the ideal printing time that gives the first > maximum shadow density I print for the transfer of all image > information. When looking at this one layer gumprint all image > details shoulkd be there in all their delicacy. But this 'perfect' > layer is still looking a bit transparant and much to weak in shadows > and midtones. Only the lightest part of the image is ok. > > I then try to print extra layers with exactly the same gum/dichromat > and pigment concentration (and sensitivity) while shortening printing > time for each layer. This adds density in shadows and midtones and > makes the straight part of the curve tilt upwards to get more > contrast. A final extra punch can be added by a black or other dark > layer with an extremely short printing time. > > When printing too much layers sometimes density gets lost in the > highlights by abrasion. That's the only moment when I sometimes print > an extra layer with less pigment. But still the same gum/dichromat > ratio. > > kees >
|