Re: Gum & the commercial ?

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Gum & the commercial ?
From: Halvor Bjørngård <halvor@ydl.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Nov 2006 00:51:20 +0900
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <001e01c6ff56$cd3264a0$0500a8c0@DC5YX7B1>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Thread-index: Acb/X+elJlriumtTEdunFQBQ5ICFTg==
Thread-topic: Gum & the commercial ?
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.4.060510

On 11/3/06 11:43 PM, "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net> wrote:

> 
> What the heck is chloral hydrate anyway???

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chloral_hydrate

It may be that they actually used this ... Time period is right and it
probably would affect pH, which affects gel strength and could make it
possible to develop gel in cold water..

I get some other thoughts here too, but :-)

Halvor

References:
- Re: Gum & the commercial ?
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>