RE: Lithium palladium vs. normal palladium
Yes, it is, 12x20 inch and little sensitizer. That is why I lack some Dmax, I think, just because I do not use enough sensitizer. I always double coat with half the strength of the sensitizer. It gives me lots of time to make very smooth coatings and cope with the hygroscopic effect of the lithium. So I go to 1.35 with 1 ml metal solution and 1 ml AFO 60% (single coat) or double coat half the concentrations. Witho -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: kerik@kerik.com [mailto:kerik@kerik.com] Verzonden: donderdag 18 januari 2007 17:11 Aan: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca Onderwerp: RE: Lithium palladium vs. normal palladium Interesting... I presume you mean 12x20 inches?? That seems like a very small amount of sensitizer for that size print. Kerik Original Message: ----------------- From: Witho Worms info@witho.nl Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:01:56 +0100 To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca Subject: RE: Lithium palladium vs. "normal" palladium I get a Dmax of 1.35 on COT 320. For a 12x20 print I use 1 ml metal solution and 1 ml sensitizer. Witho -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .
|