Re: Lithium palladium vs. normal palladium

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Lithium palladium vs. normal palladium
From: "kerik@kerik.com" <kerik@kerik.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:55:03 -0500
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Reply-to: a@xsmtp05.mail2web.com
Resent-date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 14:55:22 -0600 (CST)
Resent-from: alt-photo-process-error@skyway.usask.ca
Resent-message-id: <200701182055.l0IKtMtF009716@www.usask.ca>
Resent-reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Loris,

Those number are very similar to the amount of sensitizer I use as well.

Kerik
www.kerik.com

Original Message:
-----------------
From: Loris Medici mail@loris.medici.name
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 22:15:26 +0200
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Lithium palladium vs. normal palladium



12 x 20 = 240 / 10 = 24 * 0.2 = 4.8ml,
12 x 20 = 240 / 10 = 24 * 0.15 = 3.6ml.

See? Even at 0.15ml per 10 square inches, I use about 80% more than Witho!?

Regards,
Loris.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .