U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: Thanks, I think --Re: "Raw" for dummies ?

Re: Thanks, I think --Re: "Raw" for dummies ?

Wow, Mark. Too much information!
 
Bill Kennedy
Austin, Texas
 
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Ender100@aol.com
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Sent: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 1:06 PM
Subject: Re: Thanks, I think --Re: "Raw" for dummies ?

Argon,

I think it is the other way around.  When working in the mental health field, the occasional exhibitionists I treated sometimes exposed themselves in the shadows and then "developed" in the highlights....

Best Wishes,
Mark Nelson

Precision Digital Negatives - The System
PDNPrint Forum at Yahoo Groups
www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com


In a message dated 2/21/07 7:33:48 AM, Argon3@aol.com writes:


Re the range of contrast in your street portraits, doesn't the old adage "expose for the highlights, develop for the shadows" still have some truth even in this age of modern science miracle cameras?

I would, incidentally, point out that Adobe has just released Lightroom and you might find the demos for adjusting image contrast that are on the Adobe website to be of interest insofar as processing RAW images are concerned.

Best

argon













**************************************
Check out free AOL at http://free.aol.com/thenewaol/index.adp. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, millions of free high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and much more.
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from across the web, free AOL Mail and more.