Re: solarplate stochastic screen - Clarification
Asking for a NON "Ice Field" made screen from CopyGraphics has put a kink in me getting a screen - that request is apparently causing them some kinks. Would anyone mind helping me understand what the Ice Field does and why I don't want that - if indeed its enough of a conceren for me to look elswhere for a screen.
Thank you for helping me over my ignorance bumps/mountains...
Robert Newcomb
---- Original message ----
>Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 17:09:51 -0500 (EST)
>From: Ender100@aol.com
>Subject: Re: solarplate stochastic screen - Clarification
>To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
>
> Jon,
>
> I worked with Peter some years ago on generating
> negatives with their imagesetter. Ice Fields was
> used for image negatives because they were able to
> use it to reduce some of the artifacts in the
> negatives produced with it. It wouldn't surprise me
> that you had better luck with a screen that didn't
> utilize Ice Fields to rasterize the screen, since an
> 80% screen wouldn't be printing the tones where the
> artifacts occurred.
>
> I would suggest that anyone using a screen first
> examine it closely on a light table and watch for
> striping or moire patterns in the screen. I found
> imagesetters to be somewhat unpredictable from one
> day to the next in generating an artifact free
> negative. Good luck!
>
> By the way, Chris has a good point about aquatint
> screens. Once the legacy imagesetters all bite the
> dust, what technology will be used to create
> screens? The newer technology that creates plates
> goes direct from computer to plate with no
> intervening screen needed. These new machines
> provide full color screens using a stochastic output
> at a high resolution up around 500 pixels per inch,
> though the dots per inch that the machine is using
> to render this is much higher, Creo makes a
> PlateSetter that produces 10,000 dots per inch,
> which could probably go up to 625 pixels per inch
> when reproducing a Photoshop image. I'm not sure
> what sort of plate they use to hold that kind of
> resolution.
>
> Best Wishes,
> Mark Nelson
>
> Precision Digital Negatives - The System
> PDNPrint Forum at Yahoo Groups
> www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
>
> In a message dated 2/22/07 3:28:45 PM,
> jon@terabear.com writes:
>
> If you do order it from Copygraphics, please
> clarify whether or not it
> was rendered using "Ice Fields". Duane said they
> quickly found a file
> in my folder on their computers from 2 years ago
> -- among many -- and
> that it printed fine in a recent test swatch,
> without the striations --
> but that's not the file from the version of the
> screen I wound up using!
>
> When I spoke with him yesterday he said he would
> look further into it.
> Again, there were 2 different methods Peter used
> to create the screen,
> and I didn't prefer the one using Ice Fields for
> some reason. If you
> can get a quality version of the 1800 dpi screen
> that didn't use Ice
> Fields, that's what I recommend going with.
>
> Just a point of clarification so there's no
> misunderstandings.
>
> Thanks,
> Jon
>
> **************************************
> AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more
> about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com.