U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | RE: Epson 3800 vs 4800 - any advice?

RE: Epson 3800 vs 4800 - any advice?

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: Epson 3800 vs 4800 - any advice?
From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:53:50 -0500
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <d25.86495ba.33172747@aol.com>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Thread-index: AcdbaSQtEbxiUZ2lQ2q6eSCtTiOdLAAAHMwg

Mark,

> The Epson 3800 using all inks to print black measures about log 1.9 UV density. The Epson 2200 is about 7 stops more dense at log 4.0

Do you know what the optical density of all inks on the 3800 is?

Thanks,

Don Bryant

References:
- Re: Epson 3800 vs 4800 - any advice?
  - From: Ender100@aol.com