Re: Newbie Gum fun Continued
- To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
- Subject: Re: Newbie Gum fun Continued
- From: trevor cunningham <tr_cunningham@yahoo.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
- Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;b=h/L+T+HUI/1y+fQPnkEAWexJnjZPPHQNb1nSEp11FwhDKYAAq5uWrmsaF0N7RbmNfgn9FUBPHGD3bkNRe91FGSmm67Zn4FmW/q9mL7EXWza/p7xGuFyBL5z8M1Qn38GnphTbbLqrqSNohioqc+qu+B6H5hnKOqq7PMRM7Sunf1U=;
- In-reply-to: <004001c78677$bb1dc8b0$0400a8c0@DC5YX7B1>
- List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
- Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Thanks for the tome! It is very helpful and
appreciated.
Trevor
--- "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
wrote:
> Trevor,
> I brush size, with 4 pckts Knox gelatin to 1 liter
> water (or 1 pckt per
> cup). I add to this anywhere from 6ml-28ml 2.5%
> glutaraldehyde, keeping all
> in a thermos hot and contained. I use this in good
> ventilation. I also add
> some alcohol to keep down on the bubbles--50ml
> Everclear or rubbing alcohol
> per liter. I use a foam brush. I do preshrink the
> paper always, but some
> find Fabriano Artistico not to require it. I did
> that once and had to throw
> all my prints away. With larger gums it is a must,
> and some preshrink
> twice. If you are off 1/8 inch it is a pain in the
> popo and not any trouble
> to preshrink paper in my opinion.
>
> I tray sized once (hard for me to do because I do
> large gums so it requires
> a LOT of gelatin and a way to keep that large size
> warm , too) and I did
> like the fact that the paper lay flatter, but
> interestingly, I found that it
> did not protect as well as brush sized paper. My
> guess is that my brush
> sizing is hardening as it cools and lays on top of
> the paper better than
> gets absorbed.
>
> I occasionally do a print on unsized paper and have
> yet to feel that it
> looks better than a sized paper print in a side by
> side, but you can fudge
> it pretty well. However, this is because I do use a
> pretty heavily
> pigmented load in my gum layers. You can get by
> without sizing, perhaps,
> with a lightly pigmented layer, especially if you do
> a first coat VERY light
> pigment and long exposure to sort of cover the paper
> with a layer of
> hardened gum/image, but it'd have to have gum
> hardened in highlights, too,
> where staining will occur. But the best is to shrink
> and size and forget
> about it.
>
> One thing I find beginning gummists mix up is
> "staining" with
> "overexposure". They look different, and soon you
> can tell what you have,
> but if upon development you hardly get an image to
> show up, suspect
> overexposure.
>
> I have a class finishing up right now and they have
> got amazing gum prints
> their first forays into it with this procedure so I
> know it works for others
> than myself. I also had a funny--a former student
> donated her alt supplies
> to the department and in there was a stack of sized
> paper hardened with
> glyoxal (former professor's method) and it was
> butterscotch yellow, I kid
> you not, so if you use glyoxal as a size hardener,
> be sure to use the paper
> right away to prevent this. Or do Judy's method of
> sizing and hardening and
> then rinsing it. The former professor did teach a
> separate hardener bath,
> even, but this still produced crummy paper. Go to
> this URL and scroll down
> and see what yellowing looks like.
>
http://czaphotography.com/show.php?what=learning&which=1
>
> About the 10th image down is a comparison of
> yellowing. I know, this page
> is not a "pretty sight" but Jacek can also see
> spotty Arches paper on here,
> too, that I photographed through my kitchen screen
> door to show the
> translucent spots, and the perils of using too hot
> water to shrink, etc.
> etc. including a downloadable free gum process
> paper.
>
> I can't wait til the semester ends--only 3 more
> weeks and I will be free to
> gum print ad nauseum again...
> Chris
> CZAphotography.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "trevor cunningham" <tr_cunningham@yahoo.com>
> To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2007 2:39 AM
> Subject: Re: Newbie Gum fun Continued
>
>
> > Been following this. I've done a gum or two and
> am not encouraged by the
> > results. I'm interested in the whole sizing
> element. I know many papers
> > come already sized, but either the sizing is
> inadequate for gums or it is
> > lost in the shrinking process. When sizing, it's
> dipped into the gelatin,
> > then a seperate hardener bath? or hardener is
> mixed with the gelatin
> > solution?
> >
> > Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com> wrote:
> > PS to Jacek:
> >
> > Often the best way to get a "black" in gum
> printing is to mix two or more
> > colors... for a long time I mixed a Rowney gouache
> "jet black" with a
> > strong red. There are also complements that mixed
> together make "black,"
> > or maybe something like burnt umber with indigo
> (which, depending on the
> > make and pigment of course, can have a lot of
> covering power).
> >
> > Judy
> >
> >
> >
> > "The optimist believes this is the best of all
> possible worlds. The
> > pessimist fears it's true" - J Robert Oppenheimer
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car"
> smell?
> > Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos.
> >
>
>
>
"The optimist believes this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it's true" - J Robert Oppenheimer
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com