RE: Unknown areas in Gum printing?, etc.

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: Unknown areas in Gum printing?, etc.
From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>
Date: Tue, 01 May 2007 17:48:55 +0300
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <001f01c78bfe$45dfaff0$0400a8c0@DC5YX7B1>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Oops! Sorry for mis-quoting, it was Marek then...

Anyway, that could be better than trying to print on unhardened sizing
(+ w/o struggling to buy a locally restricted chemical) - at least,
that's how I take it ;)

Regards,
Loris.

-----Original Message-----
From: Christina Z. Anderson [mailto:zphoto@montana.net] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2007 5:37 PM
To: Alt, List
Subject: Re: Unknown areas in Gum printing?, etc.


Just for the record, Loris, wasn't it Marek or Terry King (not me) who
recommended a hardened layer of di/gum?

If the highlights are protected, there will be slight tone in them with
the di/gum layer, which adds an overall dullness to the image.

But what do I know, I'm one of those glutaraldehyde addicts, you know...
Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unknown areas in Gum printing?, etc.
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>

References:
- Re: Unknown areas in Gum printing?, etc.
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>