Re: slightly OT - dry prints
On 3 jun 2007, at 18:58, Katharine Thayer wrote: Interesting, Henk. I'm not sure how the distinction between "emulsion transfer" and "image transfer" applies to inkjet prints. There couldn't be an "emulsion transfer" with inkjet, because there's no emulsion, right? ... all there is to transfer is ink, whichever way you transfer it. Or am I misunderstanding the distinction you're making? Yes and No ... one of the discussions on the 'alt-list' decades ago was about the so-called XEROX-transfer: take a cheap color copy , coat with acrylic medium, let dry, repeat 3 times, let dry, back to warm water with some soap -e.g(!)photoflo- and start to peel off the paper on the backside, resulting in an image stick to the transparent acrylic , now just glue it to some carrier, like silver paper; the astonishing thing is that i used a 25 cent copy to do it, and after more then 6 years the colors are still ok. For the inkjet i will use pigment ink, but the overal idea is the same, apart from the fact that you can use polypropylene sheets, prepare with some white acrylic paint, 3 times acrylic gloss medium, next Inkaid or rabbit glue to allow inkjet printing, stick it to a carrier and go ahead (in six month or so i will tell about the results ...... the road to inkjet print on Awagami Unryu toke also something like 6 month ....) The image transfer -the WETtransfer- will probably take another 6 month :-) ; here you transfer the ink from the inkjetprint to a carrier. Cheers, Henk On Jun 3, 2007, at 7:17 AM, henk thijs wrote:------------------------------------ www.thijs-foto.com ------------------------------------
|