Mark,
That may be so. In my own case I have it covered since I use only
film.
For others, there is always film. I could think of several types of
systems to archive digital on film. I am surprised that none are available
commercially.
Might be a good commercial enterprise to set this up? There is
absolutely a need, because whatever you are doing digitally will be lost. That
you can count on.
Sandy
At 12:29 AM -0400 6/9/07, Ender100@aol.com wrote:
Sandy,
I haven't yet seen a system that has the resolution, a
reasonable price & is artifact free to be able to handle
this. Furtunately I do have a lot of 35 mm negatives too.
Best
Wishes,
Mark Nelson
Precision Digital Negatives - The
System
PDNPrint Forum at Yahoo Groups
www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
In a message dated 6/8/07 3:28:24 PM, sanking@clemson.edu
writes:
I would suggest that if you fellows want true archival back-up
of your digital files you better have them printed on film while film is
still available. In some cases you might even save
space.
Unless one is very systematic in moving files
from one generation storage device to the next, and I suspect that very
few of us are, the files are going to eventually be lost. That is one of
the major reasons I continue to do all of my work on film, even though I
scan and print mostly from digital files.
Sandy
King
**************************************
See what's
free at http://www.aol.com.