U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | RE: printing gum on glass

RE: printing gum on glass



Chris

Good to hear the list is alive. I will miss the APIS activities this year. I really wanted to go this year, but something came up last moment. As far as the gum on glass I have tried it last summer. I made a couple of very thin blue layers for the preparation for tricolour gums. With very thin layers my exposures were short, and I remember long development times as well. I do not think I optimised it. The project was never finished as one day my stack of plates crashed and I never started again. I was very tempted to do some gum on glass with the back exposure. This should give a nice continuous gum layer sticking to the glass. If you have a colimated UV light source that would be the ideal way to make gum on glass. Direct sun exposure is another possibility, which I might try this weekend. What is the typical direct sun exposure (not in the shadow) if anybody is using this method. A good guess would save some calibration tests. 

Marek Matusz


From:  "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
Reply-To:  alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
To:  "Alt, List" <alt-photo-process-L@usask.ca>
Subject:  printing gum on glass
Date:  Sat, 14 Jul 2007 09:23:40 -0600
>Quiet list this summer! Is no one doing photography???
>
>Tomorrow on my 4th of 6 trips this summer (gasp); onto APIS.  No
>rest for
>the weary.  Hope to see some of you there. In between trips I work
>on myth
>busting.
>
>Anyone print gum on glass?  I was working on an example to disprove
>the myth
>that printing on glass produces no midtones, a myth that seems to be
>repeated in books and is based on the assumption that the surface is
>sooo
>smooth with no bumps that it will not hold the midtones.
>
>Well the total image printed as I suspected.  But I noticed an odd
>thing--the top layer of gum when it hit the water sloughed off in
>pieces,
>revealing the complete image below it.  I wanted to see if anyone
>else had
>noticed this or even printed an image on glass (probably not), and
>if, those
>of you carbon printers (Sandy?) have said unequivocally that your
>tissue
>hardens from top down, correct?
>
>This example is not refuting that theory--because the top slough off
>layer
>was hardened.  But I still am working on the solarplate statement,
>perhaps
>ultimately not at all related, that solarplate hardens from the
>bottom up
>and why that might be different than gum.  I do not know what the
>photosensitive substance is in solarplate but the polymer being
>hardened is
>either nylon or pva and perhaps other things, and pva is also used
>in
>dichromate processes.
>Chris
>
>
>
>
>
>
>_____________________________________
>
>Christina Z. Anderson
>Assistant Professor, Photo Option Coordinator
>Montana State University, VCB 220
>Box 173350
>Bozeman Montana 59718
>406.994.6219
>CZAphotography.com
>_____________________________________
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


Missed the show?  Watch videos of the Live Earth Concert on MSN.