RE: Artistico Unsized?
FWIW, Masa isn't slower than Artistico. With my lightsource (a bank of UVBL tubes) the exposure times are exactly the same (with similar results). Can't speak for Arches since I haven't used it before (maybe I should five COT320 a try?)... -----Original Message----- From: Katharine Thayer [mailto:kthayer@pacifier.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 5:58 PM To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca Subject: Re: Artistico Unsized? "...The smooth side coats beautifully and prints quite well, but it's very slow. Both sides are slow, but I assumed the nappy side was slow because it soaks up a lot more emulsion so the coating is thicker, but even the smooth side, which uses much less emulsion, is slow, at least 4x the exposure required for my usual Arches paper..."
|