Re: alt exhibit

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: alt exhibit
From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 08:44:18 -0700
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
In-reply-to: <NFEBKFNNLLKIMINCGJJFCECNDKAA.mark@dragonbones.com>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <NFEBKFNNLLKIMINCGJJFCECNDKAA.mark@dragonbones.com>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

On Sep 4, 2007, at 9:47 PM, D. Mark Andrews wrote:

 Here I was thinking I had them
figured out.

What I'm curious about is whether for the purpose of this exhibition, pinhole was considered "alt" in and of itself, because some of the color images appear to be pinhole images, but also appear to be printed in conventional (not alternative) color printing processes.
kt

Follow-Ups:
- Re: alt exhibit
  - From: jstrain@iquest.net

References:
- RE: alt exhibit
  - From: "D. Mark Andrews" <mark@dragonbones.com>

go to date index
go to thread index