Re: Soho show

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Soho show
From: Bob Barnes <bb333@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:26:45 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327;d=earthlink.net;b=S964WECgxkCgIY0XSE/qRFObqT/DaoicOjMR5hhIwwh0v81Jebmq3M+ITIF4tOnV;h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Reply-to: Bob Barnes <bb333@earthlink.net>
Resent-date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 13:27:03 -0600 (CST)
Resent-from: alt-photo-process-error@skyway.usask.ca
Resent-message-id: <200710041927.l94JR3cR004807@www.usask.ca>
Resent-reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Thank you Judy!

-----Original Message-----
>From: Judy Seigel <jseigel@panix.com>
>Sent: Oct 4, 2007 1:05 PM
>To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
>Subject: Re: Soho show
>
>
>On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Bob wrote:
>
>> Sandy,
>>   I beg clarification.... does "lower balls" infer that there is an upper 
>> set? Please use the Greek form for clarification......are you referring to 
>> Sophocles, Demosthenes, or Testicles.
>
>Hercules.
>
>That's what they call a no-brainer.  But, Bob, AFAIK, "lower balls" infer 
>nothing.  I believe you mean "imply."
>
>J.
>