U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: Defining "post-modernism" -- WAS---  First define "post-modern" ph

Re: Defining "post-modernism" -- WAS---  First define "post-modern" photography, dammit



Chris,

this is exactly why I purchased a new Photoshop Plugin that automatically places "film edges" around my digital shots—so everyone will know that I am showing the entire frame of what was shot.

heheheehe

Best Wishes,
Mark Nelson

Precision Digital Negatives - The System
PDNPrint Forum at Yahoo Groups
www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com

In a message dated 11/19/07 1:17:38 PM, zphoto@montana.net writes:


2.  Pictures can no longer be looked at as truth/be trusted.  This to me is
a no-brainer.  Even Dorothea Lange's migrant mother was doctored, for
goodness' sake!  See www.cs.dartmouth.edu/farid/research/digitaltampering/
A whole group of photographers began constructing realities instead of
shooting what's "out there", and I like this trend (think Crewdson, Philip
Lorca diCorcia, Gursky, etc.)  However, it seems we are moving toward the
New Docugraphics in picture making that is less constructed and more
truthful.  I am happy about that because that is my area so maybe I'll be
"discovered" heheheheh.  See
http://artnewsonline.com/issues/article.asp?art_id=2003













**************************************
See what's new at http://www.aol.com