U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Réf. : RE: Réf. : Sury

Réf. : RE: Réf. : Sury


  • To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Subject: Réf. : RE: Réf. : Sury
  • From: Philippe Berger <mineurdecharbon@skynet.be>
  • Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 09:41:08 +0100 (Paris, Madrid)
  • Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
  • List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
  • References: <005301c84b0b$c7d30d00$a15dc844@christinsh8zpi><4777E3F7.000004.07920@BRGR-71024F704C><BAY133-W28C4E6F23F31616A9B2134BB570@phx.gbl><47780A83.000009.03392@BRGR-71024F704C><4778270B.000009.03696@BRGR-71024F704C><Pine.NEB.4.64.0712311959500.18056@panix2.panix.com>
  • Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Hi Judy,
 
Sorry is ti too difficult for my to understand your text in English
 
Sury and this phothography iis a pictorialist of 1924, as the same school of marissiaux and Misonne
Yhis picture of Sury is a original, i am the certificat of the son of the family Sury
 
Best reagards
 
Philippe
 
 
-------Message original-------
 
Date : 1/01/2008 3:38:47
Sujet : RE: Réf. : Sury
 
Cher Philippe,
 
Admittedly my French is less perfect than my English, and on the monitor
it gets twice as worse... but as far as I could tell (and perhaps some
kind soul will translate this for Philippe, tho if memory serves he reads
English very well, probably better than I read French), you have written a
book about the Sury process, and declared that fact on your website, but
with absolutely no mention of how one might obtain it...?!?
 
Are you teasing us?
 
However, a propos of Joseph Sury, I note what is natural, inevitable, and
to be expected, but still struck me as an "aha!" moment!  I happened (by
no coincidence -- 1924 was in the air) to pick up a book from one of the
piles that make my studio so difficult to navigate -- a bound Annual of
American Photography Magazine for the year 1924.  I'd stuck several
bookmarks in it -- including two for articles by Missone. In the early
days of the list, one member (name forgotten) had asked several times for
info about & leads to Missone's "process." (I'd never heard of him before,
but it drew my attention here.)
 
More on Missone in a moment -- but first: One of the articles in this 1924
Annual had several portraits of attractive young people: They could have
been by Sury: the *style* of the photos was identical to his, the touch &
general "look," tho lacking the richness, depth of tone and delicacy of
Sury's portrait on Philippe's site.
 
That is, we think we're creative artists with a personal style... only
perhaps within a very narrow range.  Essentially WE ARE CREATURES OF OUR
TIME ! And nearly impossible to escape it. (In fact if we aren't, we're
hopeless -- and any "teacher" we encounter will try to "improve" us to fit
the mode of the day.)
 
As for Missone -- most of what he "wrote" was filler, curlicues,
embroidery, that is, contentless verbiage, "advice" (to morons) and
platitudes prsented as "wisdom." The actual info would have taken 3
sentences. Tho, to his credit, I mention that the "crayon" portraits
Missone says he made by projecting a negative onto paper and filling in
the light areas with black "crayon," were elegant & expert: I doubt the
newby (moron or not) could have done as well without long, long practice.
 
However, I doubt the articles were written by Missone. Wasn't he... um,
Belgian?  Or something middle Europa? These were in elegant, fluent,
sophisticated, perfect English. True, many folks are elegantly bi, tri,
even quadralingual... but not so stylishly verbose.
 
For what it's worth, incidentally, judging by my own books of the period,
the American photo "dictionaries," annuals and so forth of the teens & 20s
of the 20th century tended to be duplicates or near duplicates of their
English counterparts (although titled "American," they had English
addresses & publishers on the flyleaf).
 
But I do love those old books from any country -- and just think, one day
we will be equally quaint...(if books remain & folks can read and write in
their caves).
 
Meanwhile, happy 2008 to all (can it be worse than 2007?  OF COURSE,
alas!)
 
Judy
 
OMon, 31 Dec 2007, Philippe Berger wrote:
 
> Marek and all,
>
> The Color Process of Joseph Sury in 1924 on my web site
>
> You see also one of my picture on Color Process in Black dry pigments
>
>
> I hope you understand
>
> Philippe
>
> -------Message original-------
>
> De : Philippe Berger
> Date : 30/12/2007 22:18:45
> Sujet : Réf. : RE: Réf. : Sury
>
> Marek,
>
> The sury color is not a real tricolor, the sury color is different of a
> carbon Black
> The Sury Color is only a Sury Color, a process of Joseph Sury of 1924
>
> Philippe
>
>
> -------Message original-------
>
> De : Marek Matusz
> Date : 30/12/2007 21:45:25
> Sujet : RE: Réf. : Sury
>
> Are we talking "real tricolor" here or is it monochrome, but other then
> carbon black? The picture is quite nice.
> marek
>
>
>
>
>
> Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 19:31:20 +0100
> Subject: Réf. : Sury
>
> Chris,
>
> Thank you for the translate and the link of my Sury Color Picture
>
> You say: " ...  Philippe, est-que ce papier une mixture des colloids, comme
> gelatine et
> albumine? Ou pas des colloids dans son formule? ...
>
> Chris, the Color paper of the formula of Sury and my formula using Gum as
> Colloid but also other "Chimical ingrédients", it is the secret of the the
> Color Paper
>
> Best regards and sorry for my english
>
> Philippe
>
>
>
>
> -------Message original-------
>
> De : Christina Z. Anderson
> Date : 12/30/07 18:46:03
> Sujet : Sury
>
> Philippe has put the image in question on his website and here is the link:
> It is 16x20cm, it is made by the Sury Color process from 1924, and Philippe
> says it is "not a gum print but one made with his color paper, invented and
> patented in 1924" (which patent Philippe has).  He manufactured a color
> paper and sold it at that time, much like the other papers on the market I
> suppose like Artigue and Hochheimer, etc. and like Artigue the process was
> kept secret, but apparently Philippe has written about this in his book on
> Sury.
>
> Philippe, est-que ce papier une mixture des colloids, comme gelatine et
> albumine? Ou pas des colloids dans son formule?
>
> All but one of the direct carbon papers I have come across were made with
> mixtures of colloids or straight gelatin, in other words, not straight gum
> prints per se although gum was in some of them.  The one that was pure gum,
> the J. Page Croft paper, was hardened by methylated spirits of alcohol and a
> tad of sulfuric acid in the coating mix.  I don't know if he was successful
> in his paper endeavour, as I don't know how long he manufactured the paper,
> but obviously the ones with mixed colloids have lasted because Fresson is
> still around.
>
> I find it interesting that acids and methylated alcohol create less
> solubility in gum...something to be tested. When I tested acids (lemon
> juice) it created more stain in the highlights.
>
> Enough for now...and please excuse the translating back and forth--but I
> felt that the Sury stuff is very interesting alt info to put in your pipe
> and smoke for the new year ;0
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> __________ Information NOD32 2756 (20071230) __________
>
> Ce message a ete verifie par NOD32 Antivirus System.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> i’m is proud to present Cause Effect, a series about real people making a
> difference. Learn more
>
> __________ Information NOD32 2757 (20071230) __________
>
> Ce message a ete verifie par NOD32 Antivirus System.
>
>
>
 
__________ Information NOD32 2758 (20071231) __________
 
Ce message a ete verifie par NOD32 Antivirus System.
 
 
 
Binettes GRATUITES pour vos courriels - par IncrediMail! Cliquez ici!