U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: direct carbon or gum bleach development

Re: direct carbon or gum bleach development


  • To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Subject: Re: direct carbon or gum bleach development
  • From: Keith Gerling <keith.gerling@gmail.com>
  • Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2008 19:47:57 -0600
  • Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;s=gamma;h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;bh=p/xtlte5uZsnMNafkTDQ9z5fSquX0+vW43x1KAZ0Ku0=;b=ZaX8cJi+cVdb+jTOlMlkgCFi5vcUdjKamT3P9A0dSRmYr4oWs6gmIbKvPOTLi+9OyY6uLsTh6SAXFsOqf4za5fkyByew50C8q/8O2K+ceVWano9MOCx/2V2qjWimzjCAHesTAc3whOnwErDv2X+PJHXzrYkgA9Bkk5EEGLACvFA=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;b=TFiLuIDG5df6biPpPaxS0UWrcFrO6YeCuyJ1hvg4y5tOwyM8ajDymXz1p3Ey/p6ex0tVw7L5O4FMP4iBwo24yakQfOG0IzcHJHnaaU9lttHNd3l1KFJcMhP68I6yx5PJjRqHfNZE6lg9oAOXZSEMn2Eo81zZix/Rct5XIPKUis4=
  • In-reply-to: <98766a900712201405j4dd56e9eo53336305ef2a58c0@mail.gmail.com>
  • List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
  • References: <BAY133-W706A300C4F11EF500445DBB5D0@phx.gbl><98766a900712201405j4dd56e9eo53336305ef2a58c0@mail.gmail.com>
  • Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Hi Marek,

My attempts look atrocious.  What kind of pigment are you using for this?

thanks!

Keith

On Dec 20, 2007 4:05 PM, Keith Gerling <keith.gerling@gmail.com> wrote:
> Awesome, Marek.  This is what I want MY prints to look like.  Forget
> all that multi-coat nonsense.
>
>
> On Dec 20, 2007 2:28 PM, Marek Matusz <marekmatusz@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >  All,
> >  More experimentation with gum printing and bleach development.
> >
> >  I was intrigued by Loris's results with using unsized paper. I thought that
> > it would give a rather bad stain. My tricolor gum practice certainly led me
> > to believe this. However on numerous occasions I did observe that edges of
> > paper that I used which did not have gelatin size gave a darker, more
> > uniform black. SO last week I tried to use single sized paper, fresh and
> > unsized  Fabriano Artistico, and a throw away gum print that has been soaked
> > over and over, but had a reverse side of Fabriano paper quite clean. My
> > overall conclusion with this set of prints is that I liked unsized paper and
> > soaked paper best. They gave crispier prints. Perhaps this technique likes
> > the gum to be tied up with the fiber of the paper and the bleach development
> > can give clear paper base. So I would advocate use of straight watercolor
> > paper, no need to size. I have not tried any other brand, but I should have
> > some at hand and will try next printing session.
> >
> >  I have also experimented some more with pigment density. I had a more
> > concentrated carbon stock of 3.75% carbon in 14 baume gum, that is 50% more
> > then in my last set of experiments. The solutions are left over from dozens
> > or maybe hundreds of experiments done in the last two years. Once the water
> > dried out this would result in 3.75/0.27=14% carbon/solid gum mixture (I
> > assume 14 baume gum is 27%). This is definitely black black. Beautiful
> > velvety matte texture of the deep black to take your breath away. Scan of
> > the print here. This print was made on unsized Fabriano Artistico paper
> >
> > http://picasaweb.google.com/marekmatusz1/GumBleachDevelop/photo#5145909559997921266
> >  The mid tones are a little bit darker on this screen that in reality. Maybe
> > even the two tones of black on the very edge are visible. Very outside, had
> > most exposure (I uped the exposure to 6 minutes from last time) and next to
> > it is somewhat lighter edge from exposure through blank part of transparency
> > (Pictorico). This is a further illustration of how a fine tonal gradation
> > can be achieved with this method.
> >  I have also included an detail of the print scanned at 300 dpi:
> >
> > http://picasaweb.google.com/marekmatusz1/GumBleachDevelop/photo#5145909521343215586
> >  Happy printing
> >  Marek
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > Don't get caught with egg on your face. Play Chicktionary! Check it out!
>