U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: problem

Re: problem

LOL Sandy,

This weekend, from Wednesday night til Sunday night, I went
through 25,000 digital images on my backup drive, culled it
down to 17,000, chose out of that 1000 of the top and out of
that 100 that I will do in gum over the next year.  Digital
as well as film is one big archive nightmare.  I could hang
up the camera now and just use what I have!  So I feel your
pain.  In the process I was looking for a couple measley
little items and never found them.

Which is why keywording digifiles should be a MUST.

But I did manage to print 10 gums while doing this :)

Sorry for you, Gordon--that is TERRIBLE.


----- Original Message Follows -----
From: Sandy King <sanking@clemson.edu>
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: problem
Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:26:37 -0500

>At 10:15 AM -0500 2/4/08, Diana Bloomfield wrote:
>>Maybe the reason a lot of us don't post is that we're busy
>>making  photographs and/or printing and/or griping
>>about/intrigued  by/volunteering for this presidential
>>election cycle, still getting  over our sadness that one
>>of our favorites (ie, John Edwards) has  opted out, and--
>>you know-- just generally living our lives.  I  could be
>>wrong, of course. 
>>Just speaking for me, sometimes a topic comes up that
>>either holds  very little interest, or I know nothing
>>about it (more likely), so I  don't bother to post.
>>Sometimes I notice people post, and no one  ever responds,
>>so we go back to living our lives and try to detach 
>>ourselves from the computer. 
>Not sure why others are not posting but in my case it is
>not because  of happy printing. I am in something of a
>major funk regarding the  dismal lack of organization in my
>system of negative storage. I have  been going through
>hundreds of negatives that were not well organized  and
>filed over a period of many years and trying to put them
>into  some kind of category or date system. The task is
>quite overwhelming  and makes me realize that even I never
>make another negative I  already have so many that I would
>be lucky to print even 1/10 of  them.  And after several
>days of doing this I still have not located  the lost or
>misplaced negatives that set all of this off.
>The whole experience has made me quite depressed and I am
>starting to  wonder if it would not be best to simply burn
>all of them and start  from scratch. Is anyone else having
>similar problems, or is this just  a side effect of my
>bi-polar tendencies?

Assistant Professor of Photography
Photography Option Coordinator
Montana State University
College of Arts and Architecture
Department of Media and Theatre Arts, Room 220
P.O. Box 173350
Bozeman, MT 59717-3350
Tel (406) 994 6219