RE: SPE and alt update

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: RE: SPE and alt update
From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:56:23 -0400
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
In-reply-to: <54980.67.64.168.233.1207169791.squirrel@spamfilter.nationwide.net>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Thread-index: AciVBJ01f2mHDhgKRY+k7pCfn3J0HAAIK4Qg

Clay,

>
Another tidbit I picked up from talking shop with her was that she is
making her negatives for her  'small' prints (22x30!!!) using conventional
film enlarged negatives. Only for her elephant sized prints (I think she
said these were 44x30) does she use digital negatives.
>

Wow! Where does one find paper large enough to print gum @ 44x30 inches?

Don Bryant

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SPE and alt update
  - From: Clay Harmon <wcharmon@wt.net>
- Re: SPE and alt update
  - From: Diana Bloomfield <dhbloomfield@bellsouth.net>
- Re: SPE and alt update
  - From: Alan Dehmer <woodsedge@mindspring.com>

References:
- Re: SPE and alt update
  - From: wcharmon@wt.net