U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | RE: best film for 3800 PT/PD negs

RE: best film for 3800 PT/PD negs


  • To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Subject: RE: best film for 3800 PT/PD negs
  • From: ender100 <ender100@aol.com>
  • Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 12:46:19 -0500
  • Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
  • Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
  • In-reply-to: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAIsdeRRYKtgRkfoAENz0NV7CgAAAEAAAADcgseLmsNBNlY4N8M6a1kQBAAAAAA==@caribsurf.com>
  • List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
  • Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Bob,

I forgot to mention that currently the 3800 is my favorite printer for making inkjet negatives.  The printer has a lot of wonderful features and the new head technology and dither technology gives extremely smooth print tones.  I usually run an automatic print head allignment using the Pictorico.

This printer also makes great color prints, but to me, in addition to making great negatives, the Advanced Black & White (ABW) feature is my favorite feature of this printer—it makes incredibly good toned black and white prints!

Enjoy your new printer!

Note:  I just got a mailing from Calumet showing a 10% discount on all inks and papers.  :)


On May 21, 2008, at 9:47:50 AM, "BOB KISS" <bobkiss@caribsurf.com> wrote:
From:"BOB KISS" <bobkiss@caribsurf.com>
Subject:RE: best film for 3800 PT/PD negs
Date:May 21, 2008 9:47:50 AM CDT
To:alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
DEAR DON, CHRIS, & DIANA,
Two more questions:
1) On the Pictorico web site I see Premium and Ultra Premium. What
is the difference and which to your recommend.
2) As I need to make 16X20 prints I need the 17X22 film but I don't
see if on the Pictorico site. Am I missing something?
CHEERS!
BOB

-----Original Message-----
From: Christina Z. Anderson [mailto:zphoto@montana.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 10:32 AM
To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: best film for 3800 PT/PD negs

Hi Bob,

I second Don. Pictorico is wonderful. It is now cheaper, too--20 sheets 
for what used to be 15 in a packet of 8.5x11. I just finished a project that

required me to print about 140 negatives and I had nary a problem. And I 
figure at $1 a sheet, that's only $3 per gum print and with all the time I 
put into gum that isn't so big a deal.

Pictorico.com but I think Mitsubishi now owns it or something...
Chris


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "BOB KISS" <bobkiss@caribsurf.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 7:50 AM
Subject: RE: best film for 3800 PT/PD negs


> DEAR DON,
> Thanks for the quick reply! A few questions:
> 1) Which of the two do you prefer, Pictorio or Inkpress?
> 2) From which supplier do you prefer to buy the Pictorio?
> CHEERS!
> BOB
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Don Bryant [mailto:dsbryant@bellsouth.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 9:39 AM
> To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
> Subject: RE: best film for 3800 PT/PD negs
>
> Bob,
>
> Since price isn't a consideration go for Pictorico OHP. Or you may wish to
> try Inkpress Transparency:
>
> http://www.inkjetart.com/cart/press-transparency-film-c-1_753_937_986.html
>
> Don Bryant
>
>
>
> __________ NOD32 3116 (20080521) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
> 



__________ NOD32 3116 (20080521) Information __________

This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com





--