Re: best film for 3800 PT/PD negs
- To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
- Subject: Re: best film for 3800 PT/PD negs
- From: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 19:21:01 -0700
- Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
- Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327;d=ix.netcom.com;b=C14oPVuUdqXOYobM72HoXAmZVtDFDtj9bpOvrKoYsLrepoi2WxFZVhk32hnXCuuY;h=Received:Message-ID:Reply-To:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MIMEOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
- List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
- References: <D647F5EC.4C39.483F.8572.3534D99E52F4@aol.com>
- Reply-to: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>
- Resent-date: Wed, 21 May 2008 20:21:53 -0600 (CST)
- Resent-from: alt-photo-process-error@sask.usask.ca
- Resent-message-id: <20080522022153.90CF17C26C@www.usask.ca>
- Resent-reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
----- Original Message -----
From: "ender100" <ender100@aol.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 7:09 PM
Subject: RE: best film for 3800 PT/PD negs
Gee-whiz folks, please edit your responses to this
thread. There is some HTML or something here that is much
inflating the size of the posts. The one I am responding to
was 262Kb where most e-mails are around 1 to 4.
---
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA
dickburk@ix.netcom.com