U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | ReRules: lithium bromide solubility ?

ReRules: lithium bromide solubility ?

  • To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Subject: ReRules: lithium bromide solubility ?
  • From: ric kb <ric_kb@yahoo.com>
  • Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 08:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
  • Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
  • Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;h=Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID;b=gmTGEXxuEuziOjEkgtDVU6W2WDZvS3RZNNCVhLB5TNZr6IJHnPAMdVX4RhC0pWelp9fllMHsqZ/ClJaIh3EQBVZR3sxjHWgKOky7SkQu0CEX8KQT6Kiw8n8uFX6Nvzz8LPZQ3e0VMbWa8Dv6TnvlE5M4KWRwOWQzZpdYROlm3yA=;
  • In-reply-to: <c736ac50809080348w8ed2ce5n461b0868972919fd@mail.gmail.com>
  • List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
  • Reply-to: ric_kb@yahoo.com
  • Resent-date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 09:25:37 -0600 (CST)
  • Resent-from: alt-photo-process-error@sask.usask.ca
  • Resent-message-id: <20080908152537.960A513B6F1@www.usask.ca>
  • Resent-reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Okay, I'm stepping into the swamp...

What are these rules? Capacity of the technology, and consensus of the community are probably the rule, correct? I received the attachment fine, so tech worked here. And I thank you for the information. So I concur that attachments are okay...

If there is a rule other than that I need it 'splained to me... So would the list nanny or owner speak up... please use your most accurate and authoritative voice... no screehy though I've a very tough skin... I was born in the swamp.

Richard L.

--- On Mon, 9/8/08, Dirk-Jan Treffers <dirkjan.treffers@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Dirk-Jan Treffers <dirkjan.treffers@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: lithium bromide solubility ?
> To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
> Date: Monday, September 8, 2008, 3:48 AM
> Hi Joseph, Ryuji,
> I've enclosed two pages from the book I've
> mentioned (Is this allowed by the
> list-rules? Otherwise, in the future, I'll send them to
> private
> emailadresses...).
....... snipped for focus.......