U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: Pinhole gums

Re: Pinhole gums



I sent this yesterday (Saturday) but it never seems to have been
posted to the list, so I'll try again.

Okay, here's another idea, and understand I'm just grasping at straws
here. Suppose it was so cold and dry that the gelatin evaporated (or
sublimated, even) off the paper while it was drying in the cold
wind. Then since there wasn't really any size on the paper, you got
a heavy pigment stain. You said that it never develops an image even
after developing "forever." This could be a consequence of severe
overexposure, or it could be just heavy pigment stain. Just thought
I'd throw it out there; it's the only mechanism I can think of that
makes sense with the observations, so far, but as I said, it's rather
a stretch and I don't even know if it makes sense, if this is
something that gelatin would logically do.

Katharine



On Nov 29, 2008, at 1:05 PM, Katharine Thayer wrote:

No, 60 should be fine; most of the time I lived at the beach I was
working at temps in the 50s without ever a problem. But last
winter, I found that 42 (even with a heater going full blast) is
too cold for gum. I'm not sure exactly where the cutoff is, but
somewhere below 50, I think.

Sorry, I'm still skeptical about the gelatin being the cause of the
overexposure. The problems introduced by sizing tend to be
related to coating and to staining; there's no logic or mechanism I
can think of that would explain the gelatin suddenly causing a
great increase in speed of the paper, just because it was cold
where the sizing was drying. I mean, I won't rule out anything
100% when it comes to gum, but that really seems like a stretch to
me. However, nothing else makes sense either. I'll think about
this more,
Katharine





Hi Katharine,

Yes, that sounds like problems associated with overexposure,
doesn't it? Even though I was inside, the space where I'm working
has only one heating vent, and I have that cut off, because my
flat file sits on top of it. That room is open to other areas of
the house where there is a lot of heat, but that space is usually
colder-- and last week was probably around 60 or so degrees-- cold
for inside, but not so cold that it should have presented a
problem, do you think?. I'm thinking it was a problem with the
gelatine. I was able to coat it with no problems, though.


On Nov 29, 2008, at 3:21 PM, Katharine Thayer wrote:



Diana, do you have a way of reading the humidity in your
workspace? It sounds, even with the humidifier going, that your
humidity was lower than customary, as evidenced by the problems
with the gum coating setting up too fast. However, there's a
puzzlement here, because as David said, the lower humidity should
mean longer exposure times, but it sounds from your description
that you were experiencing overexposure rather than underexposure
at your usual times. I hate it when things don't make sense.
Another possible variable: I discovered last winter when working
in an unusually cold space that the gum process doesn't work well
below a certain temperature, I'd say 48-50 F. But if you were
working inside in a room that's reasonably temperature-
controlled, that should be a problem.

As long as the gelatine didn't set up before it soaked into the
paper (agreeing with David again) I don't think sizing was your
problem here; I think it's something about the environment/
humidity, although it's not behaving as I would expect from my
experience and from industry research related to gum and
humidity. So that's a little baffling.

Katharine



On Nov 29, 2008, at 11:51 AM, Diana Bloomfield wrote:



Hi David,

Thanks. I didn't think the gelatine was cooling, but possibly
that was happening. The humidity had definitely dropped-- very
dry cold weather. I usually use a humidifier before coating the
gum/pigment/dichromate mix, and I used the same exposure times
as always. So what's happening-- when I coat the paper
(inside), doing everything I've been doing-- the coating seems
to be drying really fast, as I brush-- even though I'm using a
humidifier. I use the same exposure times that have been
successful for me in the past. So when I take out the paper,
after exposure, I can see the faint outline of the image-- but
after soaking it in water, forever, nothing ever happens. If I
brush away the pigment, that helps-- but basically the image
just sits there undeveloped for the most part. So should I be
increasing my exposure time because of the cold, or is my
problem in the sizing? When I was using all this great paper
I'd sized over the summer (when it was hot and humid), I had no
problems, so I'm thinking my problems are at the sizing stage. ?


On Nov 29, 2008, at 2:33 PM, davidhatton@totalise.co.uk wrote:




Hi Diana,

You have to be a little careful that the gelatine doesn't cool
of before it soaks into the paper. Also if the humidity drops
due to the cold, exposure times will probably lengthen. What
problems are you having??

David H



On Nov 29 2008, Diana Bloomfield wrote:

Thanks for posting those, Marek. That is brave of you to post the
originals, too. I like the rich red of those. Almost of my gum
prints have been made with either pinhole, zone plate, or a toy
camera. I made my first couple of gum prints from a lens-based
camera only last week. I couldn't believe how much easier it
was to
register from a sharp, well-defined negative. I had no idea.

I do have a related question maybe you or someone else can
answer I
always size my paper, and dry it, outside, and I sized a batch
last
week when it was unusually cold here. I had my gelatin and
hardener
in one of those electric pots that keeps warm, but I still had to
coat fairly quickly. I've had a lot of gum-printing trouble with
that paper ever since. So is that a known problem-- coating
gum, or
sizing, or hanging it up to dry-- in relatively cold weather? Or
should that not make any difference?



On Nov 29, 2008, at 12:38 PM, Marek Matusz wrote:

> Wow
> It has been so quiet on the list that I decided to post some
> pictures printed over the holidays. They are gum prints made
from
> pinhole photographs. I have done the worst thing by posting the
> originals as well, but maybe it will create some discussion
> Marek
> http://picasaweb.google.com/marekmatusz1/
> TricolorGumBichromatePinholePhotographs#
>
>
>
> Get more done, have more fun, and stay more connected with
Windows
> Mobile®. See how.


















  • Follow-Ups: