Re: Overexposeure was Re:Pinhole gums

[Diana Bloomfield <dhbloomfield@bellsouth.net>]

Hey Katharine, David-

Still here-- we were on our way out the door to catch a ferry to get  
back home, and then our cat managed to hide herself so we couldn't  
leave.  We finally found her hiding in a closet-- anyway--  as far as  
overexposure-- that is what it sounds like, though I was using the  
same exposure times as before.  So-- since this was without the usual  
humidity, it couldn't have been overexposure, right?

On Nov 30, 2008, at 2:05 PM, Katharine Thayer wrote:

> On Nov 30, 2008, at 10:51 AM, davidhatton@totalise.co.uk wrote:
>
> > That's right Katherine. Higher humidity faster printing..What was  
> > I thinking??
> >
> > It just looks that there is some kind of over-exposure thing going  
> > on here.., hmmm
> Yeah, I know, it's confusing, and I agree that it looks like  
> overexposure, that or possibly (but less likely IMO) pigment  
> stain.   I'm trying to work up a flow chart kind of thing that  
> would help us organize what variables and elements we're looking  
> at, because reading back through the thread I found the discussion  
> very confusing.  Stay tuned...
> kt