U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Richard Benson's new book

Richard Benson's new book


  • To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Subject: Richard Benson's new book
  • From: Richsul Sullivan <richsul@earthlink.net>
  • Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 09:12:41 -0700
  • Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
  • Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327;d=earthlink.net;b=DRGumJRRaqMLuG4hCRqQXx7pdMf3UOOz+DhbeazSsBt7g6NiAaoYNfJCqPGray0e;h=Received:Reply-To:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
  • List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
  • Reply-to: richsul@earthlink.net
  • Resent-date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:13:30 -0600 (CST)
  • Resent-from: alt-photo-process-error@sask.usask.ca
  • Resent-message-id: <20081227161330.EF3A413B724@www.usask.ca>
  • Resent-reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Thread-index: AcloPfGVDS0Gh6tlS2ypSI55YRkj+A==

I am sure everyone here is familiar with Richard Benson. His new book,  The Printed Picture, as to be expected is beautifully printed.

 

I thought this quote from the book might stoke some fire here:

 

Page 114

 

"Gum bichromate did allow the artist who developed the print a great deal of tonal control, and the process did become a favorite of the photographers working in the Pictorial style just after the turn of the 20th century, when ideas about painting and photography became muddled together. It is a poor process, which we see here at its  best in this landscape made in French town about 1910. Despite its occasional successes, gum bichromate is a poor process, unable to render the clear and beautiful tonalities that lie at the core of the photographic medium."

 

Obviously he has not seen some of the work of the better contemporary workers in this medium. Benson has done much to promote photography, he's a MacArthur prize recipient and Dean of the Yale Art Dept. It's an odd statement coming from such a knowledgeable source.

 

I have part 1 of a review of this book on my blog, Swings and Tilts,  found at:

 

http://bostick-sullivan.invisionzone.com/index.php