I think they would be grossly overexposed if developed.
Justin was my A level teacher in the 90’s. We spent a lot of the
time making pinhole images.
J.
From: editor@magnachrom.com
[mailto:editor@magnachrom.com] Sent: 27 January 2009 21:34 To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca Subject: Re: Astronomy Pinhole Picture of the Day
why wouldn't the photographer
simply DEVELOP the paper negative "normally" then just scan the dried
print?
M
-----Original Message----- From: Andy D Duncan [mailto:duncanad45@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 04:26 PM To: 'Alt Photo List List' Subject: Re: Astronomy Pinhole Picture of the Day
The scan doesn't affect the "negative" because
the light from the scan is just week enough and the pass is just short enough
that the print is unaffected.
Thanks
for the weblog link. Okay, stupid question but I must ask:
Everything
makes sense except the scanning… The paper neg is thus exposed to bright
light as it’s being scanned. What if anything does this do to the neg??