Re: mystery paper

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: mystery paper
From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 16:22:26 -0700
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <4B5E7477C50D4019888A3373EC23931D@DC5YX7B1><80BA2D76-96F7-4225-96D5-AFED6E223820@anteism.com>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Well it definitely is not the infinity symbol so not Arches. And not Stonehenge, therefore....hmmm....is it possibly Saunders Waterford??
Chris
__________________

Christina Z. Anderson
http://christinaZanderson.com/
__________________
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ryan Thompson" <ryan@anteism.com>
To: <alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca>
Sent: Saturday, March 07, 2009 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: mystery paper

I've used stonehenge before and it didn't have any imprimatur.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mystery paper
  - From: henk thijs <henk.thijs@hetnet.nl>

References:
- mystery paper
  - From: "Christina Z. Anderson" <zphoto@montana.net>
- Re: mystery paper
  - From: Ryan Thompson <ryan@anteism.com>