U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: Steichen image in April's 'Vanity Fair'

Re: Steichen image in April's 'Vanity Fair'

  • To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Subject: Re: Steichen image in April's 'Vanity Fair'
  • From: francis schanberger <frangst@gmail.com>
  • Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 03:55:00 -0800
  • Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
  • Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;bh=DGV41jcoPdrG2U0EbsMUzJxcWyea2iFZNBT+aWGOQ3k=;b=lhmBWnzdVwin6v7kms6zh9DoMe2sK/wUdK6l4Iz2l3n87vrV20LUcQ+AT3N+qUVYNX5VvUX9NkoZfd9BIJUZp8Cm79g2BKGS9hvLYWZNXV9wu87lkLvfvLsipFNtE9d567EFiuG+DVURrbhKi9mIHMc4uwEOijDmfvRkvy+801Q=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;b=JTyh+FgD7auIcKXy6FvxwKndx+WgRuN6OvE5eAQiPJZ+V1r8pLaQSYpQc0djUw6I5Fq/8GtVGSClhyuwCyVXNkKae9wQ/RYchXIZLjbiBgdYNKWec4JtaJjw+FVraABDjEWP78e6hJ9kWwExYHVRNFvnnxEqj4s/PBoTykPhDk8=
  • In-reply-to: <223D23A5-CC77-4A48-AC72-A02A795E9DE1@pacifier.com>
  • List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
  • References: <C5D887BF.155E1%tomehawk@ix.netcom.com><223D23A5-CC77-4A48-AC72-A02A795E9DE1@pacifier.com>
  • Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
from the George Eastman House website here is a Steichen image done with this combination of printing processes. I haven't seen the vanity fair reproduction.

http://www.geh.org/taschen/htmlsrc9/m197924870002_ful.html#topofimage

-francis

On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 8:33 PM, Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com> wrote:
Cyanotype over palladium.



On Mar 7, 2009, at 8:21 PM, Tom Hawkins wrote:

Hi Folks,

I know it’s only a magazine reproduction, but...

In the April issue of Vanity Fair (p.61) there’s an image from a Steichen exhibit currently  at Greenberg in NYC.

It’s described as a “palladium ferroprusiate print.”

Am I correct in assuming that’s a gum over palladium?

Tom


www.tomhawkinsphotographs.com








--
francis schanberger

www.frangst.com