Re: Epson R2400 inks density

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: Epson R2400 inks density
From: Alberto Novo <alt.list@albertonovo.it>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:33:11 +0200
Comments: "alt-photo-process mailing list"
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
In-reply-to: <B5DDEDED-2ABB-46F7-889F-37B273EFB681@pacifier.com>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <20090429205225.8281.qmail@webmaildh4.aruba.it><3C8E011B0C2744EAA00493BCD8A449A9@austinpowers><4A562D71-E823-4B16-8968-0D6A25DBB96D@wt.net><B5DDEDED-2ABB-46F7-889F-37B273EFB681@pacifier.com>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Okay, if I'm reading this right, Clay's graphs show how UV absorbence of one narrow spectral region varies as the amount of ink varies, in other words the amount of ink is varied and the wavelength (s) measured is constant. Alberto's show how UV absorbence varies across wavelengths, holding the amount of ink constant. Yes?

YES

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Epson R2400 inks density
  - From: Henry Rattle <henry.rattle@ntlworld.com>

References:
- Epson R2400 inks density
  - From: Alberto Novo <alt.list@albertonovo.it>
- RE: Epson R2400 inks density
  - From: Don Bryant <dsbryant@bellsouth.net>
- Re: Epson R2400 inks density
  - From: Clay <wcharmon@wt.net>
- Re: Epson R2400 inks density
  - From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>