U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | Re: Gambling PVA Size for gum over pt/pd; Was: Re: Suggestions forsizi

Re: Gambling PVA Size for gum over pt/pd; Was: Re: Suggestions forsizinggum in an apartment

  • To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Subject: Re: Gambling PVA Size for gum over pt/pd; Was: Re: Suggestions forsizinggum in an apartment
  • From: Jeremy Moore <jeremydmoore@gmail.com>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:52:05 -0500
  • Comments: alt-photo-process mailing list
  • Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;bh=MZrG0ZJJwH8sI9Gj039wOZWNUO6Yq3mKe24CleIVdTk=;b=hKWdm6rH6kGSSBDDELzNAaZKUfM8uZMZ+8bpjiSCFpAHRkN2FASszfl4ckJCoSQtW0TeeNLf/MvbmgJrFOLGbkBhLJVlyZmfPqyyJJI+K+pq/mNf4NOk0l29LXbgAn5BN8HPNYyCOl8Tj5fx1ofwNQ//anES2ktKu8LXAG1jgpg=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;b=hcBioVjICar/8atA+7Yx4d4RQfNoXdr9L0zqmP+IY/VNODA1Nh4rqNDj8YJb6cv5RXIqksNqTGymRfyocj5l7aSqlP3QTzePW4QAGeGPf+UDUc5hS0F3LwOo3iSfi+xx6ocZ3I1U85Rv0CeHZYc4wxN6WrY9n8c5B1F9xHLN7PU=
  • In-reply-to: <001601ca24d6$81b7fb40$7000a8c0@dell4600>
  • List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
  • References: <66575de70908240838h22e0c666q83da55b49139e51e@mail.gmail.com><001601ca24d6$81b7fb40$7000a8c0@dell4600>
  • Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Paul, it's technically 2, but on the first one I think I had potassium dichromate mixed up (or ammonium dichromate mixed to the wrong dilution, i.e. not saturated) so it was a ridiculously weak layer that I actually wiped completely off during development. So to my mind it's a 1-layer gum over pt/pd.

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Paul Viapiano <viapiano@pacbell.net> wrote:
Jeremy, is that one-coat of gum over the pt/pd?