U of S | Mailing List Archive | alt-photo-process-l | RE: haunted GUM (related to judy's favourite pet peeve: the pigmentrat

RE: haunted GUM (related to judy's favourite pet peeve: the pigmentratio test)


  • To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Subject: RE: haunted GUM (related to judy's favourite pet peeve: the pigmentratio test)
  • From: Loris Medici <mail@loris.medici.name>
  • Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 09:07:46 +0300
  • Comments: alt-photo-process mailing list
  • Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
  • In-reply-to:
  • List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
  • References: <4ACA812A.8090508@web.de>
  • Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
  • Thread-index: AcpGE6pcxAZZkhdjRpKZWXtczxRKNgANQ2wgAAB8zIA=

Typo correction: rehumidity -> rehumidify.

BTW, your scan shows a layer which is very dense by any gum standard(*). (As
I see it on my "calibrated" screen...) I'd try with / head to more subtle
coating solutions to start with...

(*) Whoa! I just discovered a new oxymoron: "a gum standard"!!! ;)


-----Original Message-----
From: Loris Medici [mailto:mail@loris.medici.name] 
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 9:02 AM
To: 'alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca'
Subject: RE: haunted GUM (related to judy's favourite pet peeve: the pigment
ratio test)

...Do you rehumidity?...