Re: which dichromate

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: which dichromate
From: phritz phantom <phritz-phantom@web.de>
Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2009 22:34:41 +0200
Comments: alt-photo-process mailing list
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
In-reply-to: <98766a900910091313v3587590cmf47381c4c0f74345@mail.gmail.com>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <98766a900910091313v3587590cmf47381c4c0f74345@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)

hahaha
now this sound TOO familiar. i certainly hope that i did not infect you with my disease.
or maybe it moved on and my prints are fine now?

phritz

Keith Gerling schrieb:

Does anyone know a simple method of determining whether a substance is Potassium vs. Ammonium dichromate? I just started using a fresh batch of what is supposed to be Pottasium dichromate and now I'm getting very bad results: staining and what looks to be overexposure. Whatever it is, I am using a saturated solution. Isn't Ammonium dichromate "faster"?

References:
- which dichromate
  - From: Keith Gerling <keith.gerling@gmail.com>