Re: printer recommendations?

To: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca
Subject: Re: printer recommendations?
From: davidhatton@totalise.co.uk
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:59:16 +0100
Comments: alt-photo-process mailing list
Delivered-to: alt-photo-process-l-archive@www.usask.ca
In-reply-to: <4AE2E220.20706@web.de>
List-id: alt-photo-process mailing list <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
References: <C4C8E03F.70AB.4F38.83B4.E45467A031D0@aol.com><4AE2E220.20706@web.de>
Reply-to: alt-photo-process-l@usask.ca

Hi Phritz,

Take a look here

http://www.usask.ca/lists/alt-photo-process-l/200703/msg00000.html

However, Sandy King rejected the 1400 only because of max ink density of 1.8. He has no other criticism of the printer but he needed a one stop shop for his diginegs and wantedto use PDN. If you look further in to the archives you will see that the density CAN be achieved using this system for identifying the correct colour to print.

http://www.alternativephotography.com/articles/art056.html

There is lots of stuff in the archive regarding printers.

regards

Davidh

Follow-Ups:
- Re: printer recommendations?
  - From: davidhatton@totalise.co.uk

References:
- Re: printer recommendations?
  - From: ender100 <ender100@aol.com>
- Re: printer recommendations?
  - From: phritz phantom <phritz-phantom@web.de>