[alt-photo] Re: How do you reproduce your work?
dhbloomfield at bellsouth.net
Mon Dec 28 16:22:59 GMT 2009
Becky Larson is a good friend of mine who does gorgeous alt work and
pinhole. She lives in Tampa. You can access her contact info by
Googling Rebecca Sexton Larson. Her website/blog should come up for
Sam, I love that you have these assumptions that we're all out there
getting our work published, so much so that we are faced with and need
to make these esoteric decisions. :)
Nevertheless, I tend to not show the brush marks-- although it does
depend on the image itself and the process used. I suppose if this
hypothetical publication is a book explaining alt processes, then it's
good to show those marks. If it's simply work being published-- not
specific to alt process, or an alt process how-to publication, I would
hesitate showing the brush marks. Again, it depends-- but I often
think showing those brush marks (in a publication or in an exhibit)
can get a little precious and suggests that you, as an artist, are
more interested in the process used than the image itself. At least,
that's how I think when I see something like that. I do think that
brush marks often tend to detract from an image, rather than enhance
it. Just my 2 cents.
Now I'm gonna go and see if I can get something published. :)
Hope you're having fun in China, or on your way home (?).
On Dec 27, 2009, at 9:36 PM, Christina Anderson wrote:
> Hi Sam!
> It is a pain. I did a book of my work in Blurb, including the
> borders and some of the paper as well, and it looks---cut off.
> Normally I show all my borders and a bit of the white of the paper
> when I mat but in print it looks weird.
> I just got into this discussion with a senior who did a wonderful
> project in gum. She matted leaving a border showing, 1/4 to 1/2
> inch around each gum print, but no brushey edges, and they looked
> really clean and nice, and I think it may be the way to go with
> print. I will still expose my edges, though, in framed work.
> I have been thinking a lot about the list because I just collated
> 379 pages of alt list advice down to an organized, alphabetized, 127
> pp and am very proud of myself for finally doing it. But it was so
> cool (since I have authors attached to every post) to go through all
> these names of listees over the years who have contributed. Makes
> me so proud of this list!
> Hope everyone is having a great holiday! I am enjoying family and
> good Montepulciano d'Abruzzo dry red wine and the warm(er) weather
> of Tampa FL.
> Hmmm.....wonder if there is any alt down here...
> Christina Z. Anderson
> On Dec 27, 2009, at 5:42 PM, sam wang wrote:
>> Wow. The list is so quiet.
>> My posts didn't seem to have shown up, so maybe there are still
>> Anyhow, let me see if anyone might like to respond, in case this
>> message does reach the list: in publications, how do you like to
>> show your alt work? That is, other than accuracy of colors etc, how
>> do you treat the paper outside of the image area? Would you crop it
>> all out or would you leave a faint paper color and texture?
>> I know it's something to be determined on a case by case basis, but
>> is there a general feeling that for hand coated alt processes, only
>> the coated area is important, or how about the way the coated area
>> sits on the paper surface? The question can be important especially
>> when the highlights are more of the color of the paper itself, and
>> when the paper is not very white to begin with.
>> How about some discussions?
>> Sam Wang
>> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
More information about the Alt-photo-process-list