[alt-photo] Re: ICC for Pictorico

[Vedos]

With Epsons (at least the models that use K3 inkset) the Matte Black is better UV blocker than Photo Black (that is one of the reasons why I had to rebuild all my curves made for Photo Black) -- I have noticed the same is true with the 1800 also...

More info on basic printer driver settings on Ron Reeders site:
http://www.ronreeder.com/files/9452/dignegswith3800.pdf
(see pages 6-7)

- Jalo

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
V E D O S
Alternative Processes in Photography & Printmaking
Satakunta University of Applied Sciences
Faculty of Business and Culture Kankaanpää
Paasikivenkatu 24, Box 76
FI-38701 Kankaanpää
vedos at samk.fi
http://vedos.samk.fi
http://www.samk.fi

________________________________________
From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org [alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] On Behalf Of Loris Medici [mail at loris.medici.name]
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 9:00 PM
To: The alternative photographic processes mailing list
Subject: [alt-photo] Re: ICC for Pictorico

Trevor, you have to choose the profile that lays the most ink *which
the substrate is able to hold* when making digital negatives. I'm not
sure about the current Epsons but this usually is the profile for
glossy premium quality photo papers, as you already have suggested.
Pictorico (and Agfa SelectJet/CopyJet) is able to hold ink when using
that profile...

2010/4/26 Trevor Cunningham <trevor at chalkjockeys.com>:
> The Pictorico website only goes up to R2400, before skipping to the 3800, in
> their ICC profiles for Premium OHP. Anyone have such a file laying around
> for an R2880? Or would I be good with choosing the Premium Glossy profile?
_______________________________________________
Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo