[alt-photo] Re: Arista II OHP transparencies/gum
Diana Bloomfield
dhbloomfield at bellsouth.net
Thu Apr 29 23:23:05 GMT 2010
Well, that's worth it, though I did always have a problem with damaged
ones with Inkpress. Maybe it was just 2 bad shipments.
Nowhere around here sells any of these transparencies, though I don't
know why not.
Diana
On Apr 29, 2010, at 7:14 PM, Jeremy Moore wrote:
> Inkjet Art doesn't have the 17x22 on their website so I don't know
> about that size. You're right, Inkpress is more expensive at retail,
> but I am able to purchase it at a reduced price locally (-30%) so I
> believe it comes out cheaper than both.
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Diana Bloomfield
> <dhbloomfield at bellsouth.net> wrote:
>> Well, from what I've seen (and maybe I'm looking in all the wrong
>> places),
>> Inkpress is actually more expensive than Arista (at the 17x22
>> size), and the
>> Arista is definitely less expensive than Pictorico. Again, I'm
>> looking only
>> at 17x22 sizes; perhaps the price difference is not so great at
>> smaller
>> sizes? I've bought Pictorico through B&H; B&S; and direct through
>> Mitsubishi (who, I guess, owns it). Arista I've bought only through
>> Freestyle, and it's definitely less expensive, certainly at the
>> 17x22 size,
>> than Pictorico. Check out the price differences at that size. If
>> it's
>> minimal, and I've missed something, do post that for us. Thanks,
>> Jeremy.
>>
>> Diana
>> On Apr 29, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Jeremy Moore wrote:
>>
>>> I don't see that the Arista II is so much cheaper than the
>>> Pictorico.
>>> Inkjet Art has Pictorico for $47
>>>
>>> (http://www.inkjetart.com/cart/pictorico-premium-transparency-film-13x19-sheets-p-10252.html
>>> )
>>> and the Arista II is $42
>>>
>>> (http://freestylephoto.biz/39313-Arista-II-Inkjet-OHP-Transparency-Film-13x19-20-sheets
>>> )
>>> for 20x 13"x19" sheets. (8.5x11 it's $19 for Pictorico and $17.99
>>> for
>>> the Arista II.)
>>>
>>> Am I missing something?
>>>
>>> Chris, with the Inkpress was it also a drop-in replacement for
>>> Pictorico?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 4:39 PM, Christina Anderson <zphoto at montana.net
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jeremy,
>>>> I have used both and have not had any problems with either. Ink
>>>> Press is
>>>> much thinner, more along the lines of the old Photo Warehouse I
>>>> used to use
>>>> but doesn't smear. Arista is by far the nicer of the two and is
>>>> essentially
>>>> a close enough dupe of Pictorico but perhaps thinner and also no
>>>> cut corner
>>>> so you have to watch it.
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>> Christina Z. Anderson
>>>> christinaZanderson.com
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
More information about the Alt-photo-process-list
mailing list