[alt-photo] Re: Official press release about HP large formatnegatives

[Geoff Chaplin]

I'm with Greg - having spent 30+ years in front of a computer screen the last thing I want is any form of digital photography. Film offers all the controls you need (at least for a single B&W neg) including allowing you to enlarge relatively easily without having to depend on commercial solutions for the "software" bits - using the software between your ears is much more fun. 

Geoff Chaplin
ジェフ　チャップリン

geoff at geoffgallery.net
www.geoffgallery.net

Skype: geoffchaplin1611
UK mobile (英国の携帯電話): +44(0) 7770 787069
Japan mobile (日本の携帯電話): +81(0) 90 6440 7037
Japan land line / fax (日本の電話とファクス): +81(0) 166 92 5855


-----元のメッセージ-----
差出人: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org [mailto:alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] 代理人 G Schmitz
送信日時: 15 July 2010 18:28
宛先: The alternative photographic processes mailing list
件名: [alt-photo] Re: Official press release about HP large formatnegatives

  So why even bother with digital negatives Terry.  Some here have belly 
ached, over the years, about the failings of digital negatives with 
regard to density range (and the granularity of that range).  That's not 
even an issue with film.  Toss in masking and you've got total control, 
on film, of a nearly infinite continuous tone scale.  What am I missing 
here.  My initial and continued attraction to alt-photo is that I can do 
it myself.  If I use a digital printer, produced by a large corporation, 
who's getting it up the shorts?

--greg

On 7/15/10 1:18 AM, Terry King wrote:
> This correspondence is interesting but it appears to overlook that there are perfectly good and simple ways of making digital negatives already using , for example, the Agfa back projection material and Epson printers and inks. These methods can produce fine gradations and ranges of tone that will exploit the full tonal potential of a platinum print, that is  from a negative with a tonal range of up to 2.4. See my articles in View Camera and AG  which demonstrate the tonal ranges for individual processes.
>
>
> We have to remember, however, that unless HP software is designed to cope with individual processes, printers, inks and base materials it will offer no advantage over what we have already.
>
>
> Terry King
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Loris Medici<mail at loris.medici.name>
> To: 'The alternative photographic processes mailing list'<alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org>
> Sent: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 8:55
> Subject: [alt-photo] Re: Official press release about HP large formatnegatives
>
>
> We'll have to wait and see if they indeed provide a better solution. I
> definitely see further room for improvement; I currently can only get
> something like 80-90 individual tones with - relatively high contrast
> processes like - Cyanotype, which isn't bad at all! OTOH, I would definitely
> like to use more of the total/theoretical 256 tones potential - especially
> meaningful with smooth working processes like pt/pd. If they show up with a
> method that makes use more of the theoretical limit, I'd like to adopt it.
> In my understanding, currently, the cutting edge is method is Quadtone RIP -
> but it's hard to use/learn it + more importantly, it doesn't work with
> HPs... We "may" get more tones with no (or less drastic) curve adjustments,
> if ink laying / dithering (and such) is specifically controlled by the RIP,
> optimized for negative-making. (That's why I said "I definitely see further
> room for improvement" above..)
>
> In any case, I should say that what I'm getting right now is OK, I'm happy
> with it - this is sort of (almost idle) pixel-peeping / nitpicking. We
> should really wait to see if there's really a considerable / significant
> improvement...
>
> Regards,
> Loris.
>
>
> P.S. I think Muñoz was/is using imagesetter negatives, but I'm not
> absolutely sure, just talking according to what I've seen in a low qualitu
> youtube video...
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org On Behalf Of
> Tomas Sobota
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 10:31 AM
> To: The alternative photographic processes mailing list
> Subject: [alt-photo] Re: Official press release about HP large
> formatnegatives
>
> The HP blurb says: "We're committed to helping professional photographers
> simplify and accelerate the process for producing, showcasing and archiving
> their art."
>
> Wow, this sounds like Kodak all over again...
>
> I wonder if they are addressing the wrong problem? Presumably most of us
> have the digital neg creation already under control, with the several
> existing methods such as Mark's PDN, Mike Ware's and others? I don't know
> what method does the Spanish photographer Isabel Muñoz use for her platinum
> prints, which are more than 1 meter square and beautiful, but she certainly
> did not have to wait for the HP "solution".
>
> I also wonder if this will be creating false expectations in many people.
> Alt-photo is rather more than just the ability to create a large negative.
> What comes after is more difficult.
>
> Tom Sobota
> Madrid, Spain
>
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo

_______________________________________________
Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo