[alt-photo] Re: 返: Re: Official press release about HPlarge formatnegatives
Diana Bloomfield
dhbloomfield at bellsouth.net
Thu Jul 15 20:22:47 GMT 2010
Yeah, maybe. But I feel like I do that all the time as I'm sure we
all do. In the end, though, it really is the image that counts. If
your process gets you to a final compelling image, that's terrific--
but not many people (in my experience) want to know about how you
actually got there. And I'm okay with that.. I think.
On Jul 15, 2010, at 4:07 PM, ender100 at aol.com wrote:
> Maybe because we fail to educate the public, "we" meaning
> photographers, galleries, museums, etc.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Diana Bloomfield <dhbloomfield at bellsouth.net>
> To: The alternative photographic processes mailing list <alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org
> >
> Sent: Thu, Jul 15, 2010 3:05 pm
> Subject: [alt-photo] Re: 返: Re: Official press release about
> HPlarge formatnegatives
>
>
> Yep; that's what I'm repeatedly told.
>
> Whatever our chosen process, or processes, it better matter to us,
> because-- honestly-- nobody else really cares. They really don't.
> It only matters to anybody, perhaps, if the process helps make the
> final image what it is. Even so, I doubt you'd find too many people
> (even a buyer of your art) who want to hear about the "process"
> involved in making that image.
>
> On Jul 15, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Alan MacKellar wrote:
>
>> Are we not talking about art? No matter what the process, it's the
>> > image that counts.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
More information about the Alt-photo-process-list
mailing list