[alt-photo] Re: 返: Re: Official press release about HPlarge formatnegatives

[Loris Medici]

  Forgot to add: 99% of that 0.1% will experience frustation when they 
hear "it's not digital" and/or they'll be - actually - interested in 
"which digital camera you have used"...

15.07.2010 23:30, Loris Medici yazmış:
>  Process is nothing/null if the artwork sucks, and if the artwork is 
> good, then MAYBE it would mean something to %0.1 (at most!) of your 
> audience... (Gallery / potential customers / photographic-visual art 
> enthusiasts...)
>
> Regards,
> Loris.
>
>
> 15.07.2010 23:22, Diana Bloomfield yazmış:
>> Yeah, maybe.  But I feel like I do that all the time as I'm sure we 
>> all do.  In the end, though, it really is the image that counts.  If 
>> your process gets you to a final compelling image, that's terrific-- 
>> but not many people (in my experience) want to know about how you 
>> actually got there.   And I'm okay with that..  I think.
>>
>> On Jul 15, 2010, at 4:07 PM, ender100 at aol.com wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe because we fail to educate the public, "we" meaning 
>>> photographers, galleries, museums, etc.
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Diana Bloomfield <dhbloomfield at bellsouth.net>
>>> To: The alternative photographic processes mailing list 
>>> <alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org>
>>> Sent: Thu, Jul 15, 2010 3:05 pm
>>> Subject:  [alt-photo] Re: 返: Re: Official press release about 
>>> HPlarge formatnegatives
>>>
>>>
>>> Yep; that's what I'm repeatedly told.
>>>
>>> Whatever our chosen process, or processes, it better matter to us, 
>>> because-- honestly-- nobody else really cares.  They really don't.  
>>> It only matters to anybody, perhaps, if the process helps make the 
>>> final image what it is.  Even so, I doubt you'd find too many people 
>>> (even a buyer of your art) who want to hear about the "process" 
>>> involved in making that image.
>>>
>>> On Jul 15, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Alan MacKellar wrote:
>>>
>>>> Are we not talking about art?  No matter what the process, it's the 
>>>> > image that counts.