[alt-photo] Re: BW POP pinhole

[pfriedrichsen at sympatico.ca]

Francis,

I did fix a solargraph print and it did loose intensity. I did this 
because I wanted to do an image stack on it to get rid of artifacts 
being created by my Epson consumer scanner. The Epson couldn't handle 
the weak image with any degree of depth, and scanning lines were 
visible. I wanted to get rid of that stuff so I did a stack 
-something astro-photographers are familiar with.

I also made a number of attempts to intensify the image, but was 
mostly unsuccessful with conventional silver darkroom chemicals.

You can see a solargraph print I made about a year ago. Go to:
http://www.inventionsthatwork.com/alternativephotography.htm
The capture time was Dec 08- thru June 09

Peter Friedrichsen


At 11:59 AM 03/03/2010, Robert Young wrote:

>They are already "developed".  However unless they are fixed, they 
>will continue to darken over time if exposed to additional light.
>
>The fixed tends to cause them to fade back a stop or two. YMMV.
>
>Rob
>
>
>
> > Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2010 11:20:21 -0500
> > From: frangst at gmail.com
> > To: alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org
> > Subject: [alt-photo] Re: BW POP pinhole
> >
> > Could the long exposure pinholes be developed in dilute hypo like lumen
> > prints?
> >
> > -francis
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Mark Nelson <ender100 at aol.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Loris, you don't like photograps of bulldogs?
> > >
> > > Mark Nelson
> > > www.PrecisionDigitalNegatives.com
> > > PDNPRint Forum @ Yahoo Groups
> > > www.MarkINelsonPhoto.com
> > >
> > > sent from my iPhonetypeDeviceThingy
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mar 3, 2010, at 8:02 AM, "Loris Medici" 
> <mail at loris.medici.name> wrote:
> > >
> > >  I wonder when Philippe will post anything non self-promoting which is
> > >> useful
> > >> at the same time? (Not that I think self-promotion is a bad thing in all
> > >> circumstances, but when it's the "whole thing" that makes my 
> eyes roll...)
> > >>
> > >> Philippe, starting from this very moment you're on my block-list; I hope
> > >> that this will motivate you in contributing to the list in a broader
> > >> fashion.
> > >>
> > >> Byebye...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org On Behalf Of
> > >> Philippe Berger
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:53 PM
> > >> To: The alternative photographic processes mailing list
> > >> Subject: [alt-photo] Re: BW POP pinhole
> > >>
> > >> See new web site on the Carbon Printing Process
> > >>
> > >> http://www.photographieaucharbon.net
> > >>
> > >> Philippe
> > >> mineurdecharbon at skynet.be
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ----- Original Message -----
> > >> From: "Christina Anderson" <zphoto at montana.net>
> > >> To: "Alt List" <alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org>
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 1:44 PM
> > >> Subject: [alt-photo] BW POP pinhole
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>  Ultra slow pinhole exposures, making BW paper POP (no development):
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> 
> http://lifehacker.com/5479996/construct-an-ultra+slow-pinhole-camera-to-crea
> > >> te-surreal-photos
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > francis schanberger
> >
> > www.frangst.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
>
>_______________________________________________
>Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo