[alt-photo] For those of you with the latest wiz-bang Canon digital camera
Greg Schmitz
gws1 at columbia.edu
Mon May 3 08:31:45 GMT 2010
Here's an interesting little something for those of you that like to
shoot video with your cameras but hate reading the manual:
"Why Our Civilization's Video Art and Culture is Threatened by the
MPEG-LA, by Eugenia Loli-Queru
We've all heard how the h.264 is rolled over on patents and royalties.
Even with these facts, I kept supporting the best-performing "delivery"
codec in the market, which is h.264. "Let the best win", I kept
thinking. But it wasn't until very recently when I was made aware that
the problem is way deeper. No, my friends. It's not just a matter of
just "picking Theora" to export a video to Youtube and be clear of any
litigation. MPEG-LA's trick runs way deeper! The [street-smart] people
at MPEG-LA have made sure that from the moment we use a camera or
camcorder to shoot an mpeg2 (e.g. HDV cams) or h.264 video (e.g.
digicams, HD dSLRs, AVCHD cams), we owe them royalties, even if the
final video distributed was not encoded using their codecs! Let me show
you how deep the rabbit hole goes.
...ALL modern video cameras and camcorders that shoot in h.264 or mpeg2,
come with a license agreement that says that you can only use that
camera to shoot video for "personal use and non-commercial" purposes (go
on, read your manuals)."
http://www.osnews.com/story/23236/Why_Our_Civilization_s_Video_Art_and_Culture_is_Threatened_by_the_MPEG-LA
<http://www.osnews.com/story/23236/Why_Our_Civilization_s_Video_Art_and_Culture_is_Threatened_by_the_MPEG-LA>
More information about the Alt-photo-process-list
mailing list