[alt-photo] Re: Gum over platinum article?

Denny dspector at charter.net
Wed Aug 10 16:06:07 GMT 2011

Thanks for the advice and encouragement.  I'm trying to finish up a few
other photo projects, but I should be able to start working with gum at the
end of the summer.   (I might even have a website up so you can laugh at my
early attempts.)
Thanks again,

-----Original Message-----
From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org
[mailto:alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] On Behalf Of
Christina Anderson
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 8:37 AM
To: The alternative photographic processes mailing list
Subject: [alt-photo] Re: Gum over platinum article?

Dear All,
I'm conflicted over this discussion and I'll tell you why.

First of all, Denny, there are free articles all over the web. I have a gum
article on Malin's website alternativephotography.com (the best alt resource
ever, that and unblinkingeye), Sam Wang has a gum article on Unblinkingeye,
Sarah Van Keuren just made her alt manual available for free on
alternativephotography.com as well. So easy to get free stuff.

Two, I wrote a chromoskedasic article for Photo Technique magazine, and as
far as I am concerned I'd love them to make it free and available on the
web. But they haven't done so that I am aware of, even though I have asked.
**I** won't pdf my own article and send it out because I am afraid of
copyright violation! But that is because Photo Technique still can make
money off of it. Once an author gets paid for an article, he/she doesn't get
any further remuneration, and it is no sweat off the author's back if
his/her article is read and passed around because it is essentially more
press. If you're going to be in a magazine, you're sharing with the world so
why not one more? But that is my opinion, not necessarily shared by the
copyright police.

Three, ILL easily scans magazine articles and has them available on a
website for a period of time and then it comes down, during which time
anyone can easily "print to pdf" and save it on their computer.

Fourth, I had a teacher ask me if he could copy a couple chapters out of my
book and use them in his experimental class and I said no way. If someone is
going to teach out of my manuals they can buy the darn book. Can I stop that
from happening? NO. And mind you, it's not like you get rich on book
sales--somewhere in the neighborhood of $5-8 per book if one is lucky by the
time everyone takes their cut (and btw, my books are $34 + shipping, not the
prices they show up on Amazon for). And this doesn't cover travel to special
collections, editing fees, etc. So it is not a question of money grubbing
but of fairness. 

So there are my conflicting emotions, no black and white here...

Fifth, thanks, Keith, for recommending my Alt Processed Condensed book, but
a disclaimer here: I have just finished (gasp) submitting my tenure case,
all 500+ pages of it ( a wild last 6 years), and essentially bought out a
one-course release this semester to lessen my teaching load so I could
revise my two books and then work on the gum book. First the Experimental,
then the Alt, then the gum book. I am going to bite the bullet and
intersperse hundreds of images throughout the texts and majorly rewrite. In
order to do so, over the last two years I had to learn InDesign, no small
feat. I feel the gum chapter in the Alt book is mediocre now, honestly, but
it was the best I did at the time. SO, I personally would wait, unless you
have money to burn. 

It is a scary time to self-publish, though, given the economic climate.

OK, now to keep it on topic, I agree with Keith. What is so complex about a
layer of gum over platinum? I teach gum and then an assignment where they
have to do a combotype of either gum over pd or gum over cyano or whatever
they come up with (over ink jet, for instance) and they "just do it." All of
these processes only take one thing to get good at them: doing them. But if
you have never done gum before, then that is different, and it just takes
learning the gum process, and with the web freebees you can certainly get
where you want to go very easily. 

I'm not a person who believes there are "secrets" in these things, and
expertise usually is the result of doing a thousand prints, as I have always
said. What did some guy determine, in Outliers, that it took 10,000 hours to
be an expert? Well, to get there, that first hour is going to be pretty
scary but by hour 50 you'll be good to go :) Chris

Christina Z. Anderson

On Aug 10, 2011, at 8:29 AM, Denny wrote:

> Thanks Keith.  I'm not a newcomer to alt, but gum will be a new adventure.
> I'll check out the references you mentioned.  
> Thanks again,
> Denny
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org
> [mailto:alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] On 
> Behalf Of Keith Gerling
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2011 7:23 AM
> To: The alternative photographic processes mailing list
> Subject: [alt-photo] Re: Gum over platinum article?
> All this pearl-clutching over intellectual property is really rather 
> pointless since Stuart received a one time fee for this article (and a 
> rather small one), and View Camera has already given the OK to distribute.
> Denny, the magazine will be in the mail this afternoon.  If you are a 
> newcomer to alt-process, I would advise you to hunt down Judy Seigel's 
> "Post Factory Journal" or Christina Z. Anderson's "Alternative 
> Processes Condensed" for what I would consider an easier and more 
> success-prone approach.  I seem to recall that Stuart Melvin lived in 
> Santa Fe, so perhaps his concern with humidity and temperature is as a 
> result of that, but his technique is entirely too fussy for me!  
> However, the resulting work displayed here is really quite lovely to view.
> Keith
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:27 AM, Don Bryant <donsbryant at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Don, thanks for your reply here...always better to err on the side of 
>> copy"right".
>> Paul is indirectly referencing the recent copyright debate and law 
>> suit of Jay Maisel vs. Andy Baio, and the dubious concept of copy 
>> "left" being posited by some. So I'm not so sure that openly copying 
>> and distributing an article in the name of fair use even for non 
>> profit is
> legal.
>> But my main concern was not to infringe upon Stuart's intellectual 
>> property.
>> As for inter-library loan of an article published in a niche 
>> specialty magazine being available, that surely is a possibility 
>> though many library systems are charging for ILL services or 
>> curtailing them altogether because of reduced budgets. This is the 
>> case in my own local public library system (charging a fee for each 
>> request.) And not everything is available for loan, so good luck with
>> We could spend forever discussing copyright issues. Let's not, 
>> nothing productive will come of it, instead make your own decision 
>> and act accordingly. I would rather see a vigorous discussion about 
>> gum printing and gum-overs sans the drama of a meaning less debate 
>> about copy "right" vs copy "left".
>> Don
>> _______________________________________________
>> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo

Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo

More information about the Alt-photo-process-list mailing list