[alt-photo] Re: Are we still a list?

[BOB KISS]

Not sure.  Richard or anyone else on list answer this?

-----Original Message-----
From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org
[mailto:alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] On Behalf Of
francis schanberger
Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 12:44 PM
To: The alternative photographic processes mailing list
Subject: [alt-photo] Re: Are we still a list?

If one did want to exaggerate silver clumping or reticulation, how would one
go about it? Nominal temperature developer to hot stop bath (acidic) or a
hot water stop set up?

I came across a beautifully reticulated 35mm negative (on HP5 +) a student
had left in the darkroom at school and I want to re-create the effect.

-francis


On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:34 PM, BOB KISS <bobkiss at caribsurf.com> wrote:

> No sympathy from me.  My tap water is 80 f year round.  That is what ice
> and
> fridges are for, to lower the temp of processing chems.  I lower
everything
> to between 68 and 75 f depending on the process and start with a tray or
> tank of wash water at same temp.  Then I slooooooooooooooooooooooowly
raise
> the temp of the water in the tray/tank to 80 f.  As Richard Knoppow will
> testify, modern films won't reticulate or have silver grain clumping if
the
> temp is changed slowly enough.  I raise the temp 2 degrees f every minute
> so
> in about 5 mins and 5 changes of water I have gone from 70 f to 80 f.
Then
> I let my filtered tap water do its thing for the rest of the wash cycle.
>                CHEERS!
>                        BOB
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org
> [mailto:alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] On Behalf
> Of
> as
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 12:22 PM
> To: The alternative photographic processes mailing list
> Subject: [alt-photo] Re: Are we still a list?
>
> It's too damn hot to develop film!  My tap water is coming out at 85!
> I'm developing rolls of film in 45 seconds!
>
> :)
>
>
> Alex
>
>
> On 7/21/2011 12:16, francis schanberger wrote:
> > It's been quiet. We should start up a topic of what we've been working
> on.
> >
> > BTW, I am in Boston away from my 4800 printer and making do with
Emmanuel
> > College's Epson 3800 to print inkjet negatives. Seems a lot like a high
> > maintenance pet. Some days are better than others.
> >
> > Today, I am going to pull down two Anthotypes (photogram based) that
have
> > been in the window for about 3-4 weeks (one three weeks and the other
> four
> > weeks). I'll post the mediocre results on my
> > blog<http://francisschanberger.wordpress.com>,
> > francisschanberger.wordpress.com. Mediocre because I suspect the paper
> > caused some issues.
> >
> > I've got a better rose petal one cooking (better paper) and will be
> making
> a
> > yellow Anthotype beginning today.
> >
> > -francis
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Robert K Newcomb<newcombr at uga.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> >> I didn't know if I missed some announcement or the list is just that
> quiet.
> >>
> >> Robert
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
> >>
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
>
> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
> signature
> database 6313 (20110721) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo
>



-- 
francis schanberger

www.francisschanberger.com
_______________________________________________
Alt-photo-process-list | http://altphotolist.org/listinfo

__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6313 (20110721) __________

The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.

http://www.eset.com