[Alt-photo] Re: GUM: problematic yellow?
Luciano Teghillo
luciano at lucianoteghillo.com
Thu Feb 6 08:44:50 UTC 2014
Before I start printing I need to find the time that will give me maximum
black on the step wedge. That mean that the clear part of the wedge (where
Stouffer is written) and step #2 need to turn the same "shade". With the
step wedge you will also see how many steps your mix, printing time, and
development will provide.
Luciano
-----Original Message-----
From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org
[mailto:alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] On Behalf Of
Kurt Nagy
Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 7:54 PM
To: alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org
Cc: <alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org>
Subject: [Alt-photo] Re: GUM: problematic yellow?
This may be a dumb question but what are you looking for result wise with
the step wedge, I've never used one before.
Are you aiming for exactly halfway down the wedge??
> On Feb 5, 2014, at 12:24 PM, "Luciano Teghillo"
<luciano at lucianoteghillo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Diana,
>
> Yes the paper works great. I cannot thank you enough for the suggestion!
> I will need to get my color wheel out and see if I can find another
> yellow in the Maimeri pigments that works with my combination of
> colors (which I still need to prove when layered together) or maybe try a
different gum.
>
> I hope I can solve this one quickly, test my inkjet negatives and get
> on with some prints...step wedges are boring :-)
>
> Luciano
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org
> [mailto:alt-photo-process-list-bounces at lists.altphotolist.org] On
> Behalf Of Diana Bloomfield
> Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 6:55 PM
> To: alt-photo-process-list at lists.altphotolist.org
> Subject: [Alt-photo] Re: GUM: problematic yellow?
>
> Hi Luciano,
>
> I'm so glad you manage to get some of the Fabriano and work with it,
> and that you like it. It is pretty amazing paper, isn't it?
>
> That's interesting about the yellow. I know people always say they
> often have trouble with the blue pigment, but I never hear anyone talk
> about problems with yellow. But I never had a problem with blue-- not
> sure why-- but I always always seemed to have issues with yellow,
> until someone (on this list, I think) suggested Quinacridone Gold for
> yellow. I can't remember now which yellows I used that gave me so
> much staining-- they all seemed to as I remember-- but ever since I
> switched over to Quinacridone Gold (Daniel Smith or M. Graham), I haven't
had a problem.
> I also don't make stock solutions, so can't help you there. But my
> (unscientific) thought is that it's the pigment itself. If you can
> find the Quinacridone Gold somewhere, it would work for you. I also
> like it as a yellow layer-- as it's not so much an
> in-your-face-yellow-- as it is a rich gold.
>
> Diana
>
>
>
>
>> On Feb 5, 2014, at 12:27 PM, Luciano Teghillo wrote:
>>
>> After Diana suggestion (thanks again) I was able to source some
>> Fabriano Artistico soft-press and I was able to print some exposure
>> tests. The paper is great! I am not getting any stains, and finally I
>> am printing something, even if they are only step wedges without
>> having to
> pre-shrink, size, etc.
>> etc.... The final test will come as soon as I can print more layers....
>>
>> So far no problem with blue
>> (http://www.lucianoteghillo.com/images/scan-blue.jpg) and red
>> (http://www.lucianoteghillo.com/images/scan-magenta.jpg) but yellow
>> it's not printing correctly, at least that's my impression.
>>
>> After the first test
>> (http://www.lucianoteghillo.com/images/scan-yellow1.jpg) with the
>> usual exposure times used for blue and magenta (from 1 minute to 3.30
>> minutes in 30 seconds intervals), it looked like I was not reaching
>> maximum "black" but also the steps didn't look as defined as with the
>> other colors. So I decided to print one more test with exposures of
>> 16, 32 and 48 minutes
>> (http://www.lucianoteghillo.com/images/scan-yellow2.jpg). I think
>> this
> second test is event worst than the first.
>>
>> Now everything is the same: same gum, same potassium dichromate, same
>> process. I mix a stock solution with 15ml tube and 45ml of gum, which
>> I then further dilute as needed. In the case of yellow, I mix 1ml of
>> stock solution with 1ml of gum and 2ml of 12% potassium dichromate.
>>
>> The watercolor used for yellow is Maimeri Blue, Primary Yellow, PY97
>> (Arylide yellow, also known as Monoazo yellow).
>>
>> This might be important or not, but I noticed some separation between
>> gum and pigment in the stock solution bottle. If I let the bottle
>> rest for a day, I can see a ring the color of gum 1/4" thick on top,
>> something I did not notice with the other colors.
>>
>> Do you have any advice? I do not have other yellow tubes from other
>> pigments/brands but I could look for it. It just seems strange that I
>> cannot print this color!!!
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Luciano
>> _______________________________________________
>> Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
>
_______________________________________________
Alt-photo-process-list | altphotolist.org
More information about the Alt-photo-process-list
mailing list